Exploring a Preliminary Set of Indicators to Measure Adolescent Health: Results From a 12-Country Feasibility Study
Anna E. Kågesten,Andrew D. Marsh,Simone Storey,Parviz Abduvahobov,Emmanuel Adebayo,Ana Isabel Amezquita Velásquez,Peter S. Azzopardi,Mariame Gueye Ba,Krishna Bose,Mamady Kankou Camara,Marcelo Cardona,Jermias da Cruz,Saeed Dastgiri,Lucy Fagan,B. Jane Ferguson,Charity R. Giyava,Priya Karna,Sarah C. Keogh,Marina Melkumova,Ann-Beth Moller,Holly Newby,Edwin Swai,Makilioubè Tchandana,Qudsia Uzma,Gboboto Jérôme Yoffo,Zamzaireen Zainal Abidin,Mesfin Zbelo,Regina Guthold
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.01.017
IF: 7.898
2024-05-18
Journal of Adolescent Health
Abstract:Purpose To explore data availability, perceived relevance, acceptability and feasibility of implementing 52 draft indicators for adolescent health measurement in different countries globally. Methods A mixed-methods, sequential explanatory study was conducted in 12 countries. An online spreadsheet was used to assess data availability and a stakeholder survey to assess perceived relevance, acceptability, and feasibility of implementing each draft indicator proposed by the Global Action for Measurement of Adolescent health (GAMA). The assessments were discussed in virtual meetings with all countries and in deep dives with three countries. Findings were synthesized using descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis. Results Data availability varied across the 52 draft GAMA indicators and across countries. Nine countries reported measuring over half of the indicators. Most indicators were rated relevant by stakeholders, while some were considered less acceptable and feasible. The ten lowest-ranking indicators were related to mental health, sexual health and substance use; the highest-ranking indicators centered on broader adolescent health issues, like use of health services. Indicators with higher data availability and alignment with national priorities were generally considered most relevant, acceptable and feasible. Barriers to measurement included legal, ethical and sensitivity issues, challenges with multi-sectoral coordination and data systems flexibility. Discussion Most of the draft GAMA indicators were deemed relevant and feasible, but contextual priorities and perceived acceptability influenced their implementation in countries. To increase their use for a more comprehensive understanding of adolescent health, better multi-sectoral coordination and tailored capacity building to accommodate the diverse data systems in countries will be required.
pediatrics,public, environmental & occupational health,psychology, developmental