Abstract:Copy number variations (CNVs) are gain and loss of DNA sequence of a genome. High throughput platforms such as microarrays and next generation sequencing technologies (NGS) have been applied for genome wide copy number losses. Although progress has been made in both approaches, the accuracy and consistency of CNV calling from the two platforms remain in dispute. In this study, we perform a deep analysis on copy number losses on 254 human DNA samples, which have both SNP microarray data and NGS data publicly available from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genomes Project respectively. We show that the copy number losses reported from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genome Project only have < 30% overlap, while these reports are required to have cross-platform (e.g. PCR, microarray and high-throughput sequencing) experimental supporting by their corresponding projects, even though state-of-art calling methods were employed. On the other hand, copy number losses are found directly from HapMap microarray data by an accurate algorithm, i.e. CNVhac, almost all of which have lower read mapping depth in NGS data; furthermore, 88% of which can be supported by the sequences with breakpoint in NGS data. Our results suggest the ability of microarray calling CNVs and the possible introduction of false negatives from the unessential requirement of the additional cross-platform supporting. The inconsistency of CNV reports from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genomes Project might result from the inadequate information containing in microarray data, the inconsistent detection criteria, or the filtration effect of cross-platform supporting. The statistical test on CNVs called from CNVhac show that the microarray data can offer reliable CNV reports, and majority of CNV candidates can be confirmed by raw sequences. Therefore, the CNV candidates given by a good caller could be highly reliable without cross-platform supporting, so additional experimental information should be applied in need instead of necessarily.

A robust statistical method for Genome-wide association analysis of human copy number variation

Accuracy Of Cnv Detection From Gwas Data

Novel Association Strategy with Copy Number Variation for Identifying New Risk Loci of Human Diseases

CNV-Profile Regression: A New Approach for Copy Number Variant Association Analysis in Whole Genome Sequencing Data

Robust Regression Analysis of Copy Number Variation Data based on a Univariate Score

CNV-TV: A Robust Method to Discover Copy Number Variation from Short Sequencing Reads

CRSCNV: A Cross-Model-Based Statistical Approach to Detect Copy Number Variations in Sequence Data

BMI-CNV: A Bayesian framework for multiple genotyping platforms detection of copy number variation

CNV-P: a machine-learning framework for predicting high confident copy number variations

Using GWAS Data to Identify Copy Number Variants Contributing to Common Complex Diseases

Genome-wide association testing beyond SNPs

An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools from whole-exome sequencing data.

Statistical Detection of Genome Differences Based on CNV Segments.

Copy Number Analysis Of Whole-Genome Data Using Bic-Seq2 And Its Application To Detection Of Cancer Susceptibility Variants

CNVbd: A Method for Copy Number Variation Detection and Boundary Search

An Accurate and Powerful Method for Copy Number Variation Detection

nbCNV: a multi-constrained optimization model for discovering copy number variants in single-cell sequencing data

A Remark on Copy Number Variation Detection Methods

Pscc: Sensitive And Reliable Population-Scale Copy Number Variation Detection Method Based On Low Coverage Sequencing

A Single Cell Level Based Method For Copy Number Variation Analysis By Low Coverage Massively Parallel Sequencing

Copy Number Variation Detection In Whole-Genome Sequencing Data Using The Bayesian Information Criterion