Abstract:Digitalization has expanded the scope of citizen participation. Nevertheless, there are no conclusive findings on online citizen participation and inclusive policymaking. This study adds in line with the discussion with a fresh perspective of institutional bias. It presents new evidence by examining the process, participants, policy agenda, and sentiments of public opinions from the government-led and Internet-empowered citizen participation regarding the 2017–2035 Shanghai Master Plan. Four findings are reported based on the in-depth case study with text and sentiment analysis. First, the government-led model provides institutionalized opportunities for citizen engagement throughout the policy process, while the Internet-empowered citizen participation is characterized by contingency and ad hoc. Second, the government-led model remains elite-dominated, while the Internet empowers a wider scope of stakeholders with an open and popularized participation platform. Third, the public opinion from the Internet-empowered model often goes beyond or even against the pre-defined official principles and goals. In contrast, the civic discussion in the government-led model influences policy by changing the sequence of policy agenda or providing focus within the official setting. Fourth, citizens, especially the experts, are more likely to give positive feedback in the government-led model than the Internet-empowered approach. These findings confirm and identify the remaining institutional bias that hinders inclusive policymaking in the Internet age. Theoretically, it reminds scholars to examine the institutional arrangements regarding citizen participation carefully. Practically, it indicates that the central government could facilitate inclusive policymaking at the local level by reducing the institutional bias of the government-led approach and utilizing text and sentiment analysis to urge the local government's response to Internet-empowered public opinion.

Citizen Participation, Perceived Public Service Performance, and Trust in Government: Evidence from Health Policy Reforms in Hong Kong

Types of Public Participation and Their Effect on Satisfaction with Local Public Services in China

Citizen Participation,Performance Evaluation & Citizen Trust in Government

Government Transparency and Perceived Social Equity: Assessing the Moderating Effect of Citizen Trust in China

Public Participation and Governance Performance in Gender-Imbalanced Central Rural China: The Roles of Trust and Risk Perception

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND CITIZEN SATISFACTION WITH THE GOVERNMENT: EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE MUNICIPALITIES

Government-led and Internet-empowered Citizen Participation in China's Policymaking: A Case Study of the Shanghai 2035 Master Plan.

Citizen Participation in Government Performance Measurement:A Historical Review and Assessment

Citizen Participation in China

The Effectiveness of Online Citizen Evaluation of Government Performance: A Study of the Perceptions of Local Bureaucrats in China

Urban Government Performance in the Eyes of Chinese Urban Residents

Participative Leadership and the Organizational Commitment of Civil Servants in China: the Mediating Effects of Trust in Supervisor

Is Transparency a Double-Edged Sword in Citizen Satisfaction with Public Service? Evidence from China’s Public Healthcare

Public Participation in China's Health Reform

Public Perceptions About Smart Cities: Governance and Quality-of-Life in Hong Kong

The Performance-Trust Link: Implications for Performance Measurement

Deciphering Trust in Grassroots Government for Vibrant Resident Participation in Neighborhood Regeneration: an Empirical Study in China's Top-Down Governance System

Governance capacity, social justice, social security, and institutionalized political participation in China: A moderated mediation model

Determinants of Public Trust in Government: Empirical Evidence from Urban China

A Meta‐Analysis of the Government Performance—Trust Link: Taking Cultural and Methodological Factors into Account

Exploring the relationship between government budget information and citizens’ perceptions of public service performance in China