Comparison Between Blue on Yellow Perimetry and Standard Automatic Perimerty in Diagnosis of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

李劲嵘,余敏斌,钟华,邱璇,林羡钗
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2009.02.022
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate application of Blue on Yellow Perimetry(BYP)and Standard Au-tomatic Perimerty(SAP)in the diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma(POAG)patients.Methods A total of 72 patients (120 eyes)diagnosed POAG were enrolled for SAP and BYP examination.There were 26 females (44 eyes)and 46 males (76 eyes).50 left eyes, 70 Right eyes.Mean (SD)age of the patients was 43.87(17.53) years(range, 16-79 years).All patients were both examined blue on yellow with FASTPAC and SAP with SITA Standard strategy separately,using the Humphrey Field Analyzer 750 Ⅱ-i and Program 30-2.Results In the early period POAG patients,BYP compared SAP with the scope of defect was usually increased,deeper and wider.In the moderate POAG patients,BYP could detect some defects that SAP could not,and showed the same defect depth as SAP.In the advanced period the ability of BYP to reflect the visual field damage is as same as SAP.In visual field index for the diagnosis of contributions,the defect points are with the best diagnos-tic value.Conclusions BYP should be more suitable for the screening of POAG suspected.When extensive vi-sual field damage occurred, the diagnostic capability of BYP was equal to SAP.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?