Abstract:Context: Critical values lists have been used for many years to decide when to notify physicians and other caregivers of potentially life-threatening situations; however, these lists have not been studied widely. Objectives: To investigate critical values lists in institutions participating in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes program and to provide suggestions for improvement. Setting: A total of 623 institutions voluntarily participating in the Q-Probes program. Design: A multipart study in which participants responded to information from preprinted lists, collected information about current practices, completed a questionnaire, monitored critical values calls, reviewed patients' medical records, and surveyed nursing supervisors and physicians about critical values. Main outcome measures: Defining critical values systems, including lists, personnel, costs, processes, usefulness, and related medical outcomes. Results: Critical values lists were determined for routine chemistry and hematology analytes and were found to vary widely among participants. In contrast, more than 95% of participants reported positive blood cultures, cerebrospinal fluid cultures, and toxic therapeutic drug levels as critical values. Based on more than 13 000 critical values, participants' data showed that most critical values reports (92.8%) were made by the person who performed the test, and that 65% of reports for inpatients were received by nurses. For outpatients, physicians' office staff received the largest percentage (40%) of reports. The majority of participants (71.4%) had no policy on how repeat critical calls should be handled. On average, completion of notification required about 6 minutes for inpatients and 14 minutes for outpatients. Slightly greater than 5% of critical value telephone calls were abandoned, with the largest percentage abandoned for outpatients. More than 45% of critical values were unexpected, and 65% resulted in a change in therapy. Although only 20.8% of 2301 nursing supervisors thought critical values lists were helpful, 94.9% of 514 physicians found critical values lists valuable. Conclusions: Critical values systems were medically important, highly variable, but also costly practices for participants. We propose a number of recommendations for improvement, including that the critical values list should be approved by the medical staff, each laboratory should develop a written policy for handling initial and repeat critical values reports, a foolproof policy should be established to report results from calls abandoned, and efforts at automating the process should become widespread.

Establishment and Application of the Critical Value Monitoring Platform

Analysis of the characteristics and management of critical values in a newborn tertiary center in China

The Application Evaluation of Clinical Decision Support in Auto-verification and Interpretation of Laboratory Test Results

The internal management of critical value

A Study on the LIS and HIS Integration

Design and Practice of the Clinical Information System for ICU

Research on Informatization Construction of Inspection and Quality Control for Medical Devices in Hospital Critical Platform

Design of an information platform of performance evaluation for essential medicines using system

The Application and Experiences of Real-time Monitor System of Electronic Medical Record

Continuously improve the medical care quality and hospital management level through medical information system construction

Discussions on the management of health check-up nursing quality

Establishment of a Quantitative Medical Technology Evaluation System and Indicators within Medical Institutions

Practice on fine management and control of medical consumables of hospitals

[Design and implementation of an integrated information platform for emergency interconnection]

Development of a Real-Time Monitoring Platform for Medical Equipments Using Multi-Mode Data Acquisition

Establishment of the Evaluation System for Information Quality Control in Hospitals

Laboratory critical values policies and procedures: a college of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study in 623 institutions

Development of information system for radiodiagnosis and radiotherapy equipment based on risk monitoring

Design and implementation of monitoring center based on variety of communication methods

Developing the Information Platform of Performance Evaluation of the Disease Control and Prevention System

Exploration and Practice of the Management of High-risk Medicines in Our Hospital