Clinical Efficacy of Endoscopic Infratentorial Supracerebellar Approach for Pineal Region Tumors: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
Yaozu Zhu,Zhengwei Li,Zhongwei Xiong,Tingbao Zhang,Jincao Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5702309
2022-01-01
Abstract:Tumors in the pineal region are deep, with complex surrounding anatomy, adjacent to important blood vessels and nerve structures, and surgical resection is difficult and risky. In this paper, we reviewed the literature to understand the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of pineal region tumors in the country and study the clinical indications, related problems, and successful experiences of patients with pineal region tumors treated by the transtentorial-superior approach. The clinical data of 80 patients with pineal region tumors were selected as the retrospective research objects and divided into the control group and the treatment group, with 40 cases in each group, according to the random number table method. The control group was treated using the endoscopic transtentorial approach (Poppen approach), while the treatment group was treated with the endoscopic supratentorial approach (Krause approach). The inflammatory factors, inflammatory stress response, postoperative neurological dysfunction, clinical efficacy, and poor prognosis were observed and compared between the two groups. Tumor resection and recurrence were used to compare the clinical outcomes of tumors in the pineal region. The extent of surgical resection was 100% higher in both groups, and the treatment group was comparable to the control group. The prognosis of patients after the operation was poor. Nausea and vomiting, visual disturbance, upper vision paralysis, and ataxia in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control group, with no statistical significance (P > 0.05). At the same time, the bone window can be reduced to reduce trauma and provide a certain reference for patients to choose a safe and complete resection method.