Clinical analysis of long-term follow-up for 30 recipients after combined organ transplantation

苗芸,于立新,邓文锋,付绍杰,徐健,杜传福,王亦斌,余玉明,叶俊生
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2015.07.003
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To summarize the long-term outcomes of recipients after combined liverkidney transplantation (CLKT), combined kidney-pancreas transplantation (CKPT), and to evaluate the interactions of transplant grafts.Method The clinical data of 30 recipients who received combined organ transplantation in Nanfang Hospital from June 2001 to December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed, including 24 recipients with CLKT, and 6 with CKPT.Result The median follow-up time was 82 months (7-168 months).The cumulative 1-, 3-, 5-, 10-year patient survival rate of CLKT was 87.5%, 79.2%, 75.0% and 54.2%, and that of CKPT was 100%, 100%, 100% and 66.7%,respectively.The causes of death for those combined transplantations were cardio-cerebrovascular diseases (5 cases), infection (3 cases), malignancy (2 cases) and transplanted liver failure (2 cases),respectively.Comparison of the rate of delayed graft failure (DGF), acute rejection (AR), chronic rejection (CR) for the first year post-transplantation and renal graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine) of CLKT and isolated kidney transplantation from the same donor at 1st year revealed that all these indexes were superior to the latter with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.05).But there was no remarkable difference between CKPT and isolated kidney transplant recipients for the above indexes.For 6 cases of CLKT, the mean survival time of pancreatic grafts was longer than kidney grafts.Conclusion Combined organ transplantation is effective for treatment of multiple organ failure diseases.The shortage of donors severely limits the development of multiple organ transplantation.For CLKT recipients, the liver graft has the immuneprotection on the homologous kidney graft.For CKPT recipients, survival time of pancreatic grafts is longer than kidney grafts.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?