[Clinical Analysis of Different Periods of Liver Transplantation at an Organ Transplantation Centre].

Ting-bo Liang,Shu-sen Zheng,Wei-lin Wang,Dong-sheng Huang,Yan Shen,Min Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j:issn:0529-5815.2003.01.003
2003-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To summarize our clinical experience in liver transplantation while considering the background in this field in China.METHODS:Ninety-five patients who had received liver transplantation from April 1993 to March 2002 were analyzed retrospectively. Three periods were defined objectively as period I (1993 - 1997), II (1999) and III (2000 - 2002). Operative techniques, recipients, original diseases, complications and survival rates were compared among the three periods.RESULTS:Malignant liver lesions were the main cause for liver transplantation in period I and II. The ratio of number of malignant disease to total recipients decreased gradually from period I to III (100%, 53% and 35%, respectively). The 1-year survival rate in patients with benign liver disease was 85% and the total operative mortality was 5% in period III. The incidence of hepatitis B virus reactivation or reinfection was 24% twelve months after liver transplantation. Vascular complication decreased but biliary complications did not and remained a major long-standing problem. No veno-venous bypass technique was used in period III, and its advantages were obvious when comparing with those with veno-venous bypass in period I and II.CONCLUSIONS:Strict selection of recipients, fine operative technique, familiarity with various complications and correct therapeutic methods, prophylaxis of recurrence of hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma are necessary to improve long-term results of liver transplantation in China.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?