The Cause and Treatment of Fracture of Cemented Femoral Stems after Hip Replacement

徐志宏,陈东阳,邱旭升,蒋青,袁涛,翁文杰
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2010.06.002
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the cause and treatment of the fracture of homemade cemented femoral stems. Methods From March 2003 to March 2009, 8 patients of non-traumatic fractures of femoral stem were entered in the study, including 6 males and 2 females. The average weight was 75 kg (range, 60-88 kg) and time from the primary hip arthroplasty was 72 months (range, 36-98 months). The primary pros-thesis location, prosthesis fracture type, bone cement covering and periprosthetic fractures were evaluated. The cement mantle covering and the main points of removing the fractured stems were reviewed. The effect of revisions in 5 cases was evaluated by the radiographs and Harris scores. Results Four primary femoral components were in varus and 1 was in valgus. Five femoral components were small in size. The location of the fractures was in the middle and lower parts of the stem. None of the radiographs demonstrated loosening of the cement mantle at the distal position, while 4 radiographs before the fractures showed bright lines at the proximal position. Five stems were revised by cementless stems, and the proximal fractured stems could be easily removed, but all the distal were difficult to remove. Bone windows at the lateral femur were opened in 4 patients and an extended trochanteric osteotomy was done in 1 patient to remove the distal stem. The revised patients were followed up for an average time of 48 months (range, 12 80 months). All the revisions are successful and the cementless revision stems were well press-fit. The location of bone windows or os-teotomy healed for an average time of 3.5 months after the revisions. There were no infection, prosthetic loos-ening and sinking and the average Harris score was 92 (range, 85-97). Conclusion The fracture of the ce-ment stem may result in the different fixation quality of the proximal and distal portion. The revision of frac-tured stem should be done in time and a bone window opened at the lateral femur is safe and effective.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?