Mechanism of Oxidative Stress Reaction Due to Sulfur Mustard-Induced Acute Lung Injury in Rats Via Intraperitoneal and Tracheal Injection

韩玮,朱双双,赵建,贝媛媛,钟玉绪,刘菲,王涛,赵超,祝筱姬
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-436x.2016.11.010
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To establish animal model of sulfur mustard (SM)-induced acute lung injury in rats via intraperitoneal and tracheal injection,in order to compare the difference of oxidative stress reaction.Methods 136 male Sprague Dawley rats were selected and randomly divided into five groups,the control group with eight cases,other four groups (i.e.the intraperitoneal SM group,the intraperitoneal propylene glycol group,the tracheal SM group,the tracheal propylene glycol group) with 32 cases in each group.The rats in intraperitoneal SM group were injected intraperitoneally with diluted SM 0.1 ml (0.96 LD50 =8 mg/kg),the rats in tracheal SM group were injected intratracheally with diluted SM 0.1 ml (0.98 LD50 =2 mg/kg),meanwhile the status quo was kept with the normal group.SM-induced oxidative stress was observed by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and immunohistochemical staining.Results In bronchoalveolar lavage fluid,lactate dehydrogenase and glutathione peroxidase levels in the intraperitoneal SM group at a period of time were increased compared with the tracheal SM group (all P <0.05).Serum γ-glutamyl transpeptidase and thobarbituric acid reactive substances levels in the intraperitoneal SM group at a period of time were higher than those in the tracheal SM group (all P <0.05).In the alveolar septum,the positive expression ratios of 8-hydroxy deoxyguanosine,nuclear factorE2 related factor 2 and heme oxygenase-1 in the intraperitoneal SM group at a period of time were increased compared with the tracheal SM group (all P <0.05).Conclusions Under similar concentration of SM via intraperitoneal and tracheal injection in rats,indexes of lung oxidative stress in the intraperitoneal injection are increased compared with the tracheal injection,which may be related to fast absorption of the peritoneal cavity to SM.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?