The Comparison Study of Four Kinds of Tests for Diagnosis of Von Willebrand Disease

周静,贾永前,江虹,羊裔明,贾劲,邓承祺
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j:issn:1009-9158.2005.02.019
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the clinical application of four kinds of tests for von Willebrand disease (vWD).Methods The von Willebrand factor collagen binding assay (vWF:CBA), von Willebrand factor antigen levels ( vWF:Ag), standard ristocetin cofactor(vWF:Rcof)and ristocetin induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) were mearsured from healthy donors, patients with different types of vWD, hemophilia and other bleeding disorders. Comparing the four kinds of assays for their ability to detect vWD.Results In general, the four assays have the capability to identify vWD from normal and other bleeding disorders and can be used for diagnosing vWD. In type 1 vWD group, vWF:CBA and vWF:Ag showed a correlation(r=0.9610),followed by vWF:Rcof and RIPA (r=0.9164), vWF:Ag and RIPA showed the lowest (r=0.8132). The coefficient of variation of vWF:CBA was the smallest (3.9%), followed by vWF:Ag (4.1%), the coefficient of variation of vWF:Rcof and RIPA were higher (15.5% and 17.3%, respectively).The concordance of the four assays on vWD was vWF:Ag 85.7%,vWF:Rcof 76.2%,RIPA 80.9%,vWF:CBA 95.2% ,respectively.Conclusion vWF:CBA measured by ELISA is highly reproducible, and easy to operate. The measurement of the functional activity of vWF by vWF:Rcof or RIPA can be replaced by the more reliable vWF:CBA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?