[Research of the Efficiency of Different Lupus Anticoagulant Assays].

Weiling Shou,Qian Chen,Wei Wu,Liankai Fan,Tian Xie,Wei Cui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2015.34.006
2015-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVETo provide valuable test by evaluating the efficiency of lupus anticoagulant assays based on different principles.METHODS370 citrated samples were recruited, LA were tested by dRVVT, SCT, APTT-Actin, APTT-Actin FSL and APTT-SS respectively, and 1:1 mixing tests before incubation were studied in all the recruited subjects. For LA testing, the results of 1:1 mixing test were expressed as index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA), and the confirm test results were expressed as percent of correction (C) and normalized ratio (NR). The reference interval (RI)/Cut-off values of all the assays were established, and the efficiency of all the assays were further studied.RESULTSThe RI/Cut-off values of all assays were different. The sensitivity of dRVVT were the highest among all the assays (70.3%-93.1%), and the sensitivity of APTT (<55.0%) were the lowest. The sensitivity of APTT-SS (47.5%-53.5%) were higher than APTT-Actin (32.7%-39.6%) and APTT-Actin FSL (29.7%-36.6%). The specificity of dRVVT, SCT and three APTT were 91%-100%, 80.6%-100%, and 85.1%-98.5%, respectively. The specificity of SCT confirm test were 100%. Sensitivity of all the five methods were decreased in the weak positive LA. The sensitivity of dRVVT and SCT were more than 50.0%, however, the sensitivity of APTT-Actin and APTT-Acitn FSL were less than 16.0%. The sensitivity of APTT-SS were 23.7%-30.5%. Except the APTT-SS, dRVVT and SCT were correlated with thrombotic risk in APS patients (OR: 5.562-9.240, P<0.05).CONCLUSIONSEvery Laboratory should establish local LA RI/Cut-off values. dRVVT is the best assay for LA test, and APTT-SS method is superior to the other APTT method. The different test combinations of dRVVT and SCT are correlated with thrombotic risk in APS patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?