Abstract:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the anteroposterior (AP) position and inclination of the maxillary incisors in subjects with class I normal occlusion and a harmonious profile with patients with skeletal class III malocclusions, and to investigate the changes in maxillary incisor inclination and AP position after surgical-orthodontic treatment in class III patients.Material and methods: Sixty-five subjects (35 female and 30 male; mean age: 21.8 +/- 3.89 years) with normal profiles and class I skeletal and dental patterns were selected as a control sample. Sixty-seven patients (38 female and 29 male; mean age: 21.3 +/- 3.31 years) with skeletal and dental class III malocclusions who sought surgical-orthodontic treatment were used as the study sample. Subjects were asked to smile and profile photographs were taken with the head in a natural position and the maxillary central incisors and the forehead in full view; cephalograms were taken and superimposed on the profile pictures according to the outline of the forehead and nose. Forehead inclination, maxillary incisor facial inclination and the AP position of the maxillary central incisor relative to the forehead (FAFFA) were measured on the integrated images and statistical analyses were performed.Results: In both groups, there were no significant male/female differences in either the maxillary central incisor inclination or AP position. Female subjects had a significantly steeper forehead inclination compared with males (P < 0.001) in both groups. After combined surgical-orthodontic treatment, the significant labial inclination (P < 0.001) and posterior positioning (P < 0.001) of the maxillary central incisors had been corrected to close to normal range (P> 0.05). In the control group, 84.6% had the facial axial point (FA) of their maxillary central incisors positioned between lines through the forehead facial axis (FFA) point and the glabella. In the study group, however, 79.1% had the maxillary central incisors positioned posterior to the line through the FFA point and the difference with the control group was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The position of the maxillary central incisors was strongly correlated with forehead inclination in the control sample (r(2) = 0.456; P < 0.01), but only a poor correlation was detected in the class III group (r(2) = 0.177; P> 0.05).Conclusions: With the integrated radiograph photograph method, the lateral cephalogram was reoriented, which makes it possible to accurately measure the variables on profile photographs. The AP position and inclination of the maxillary central incisors relative to the forehead plays an important role in the esthetics of the profile during smiling and could be an important variable to be considered during diagnosis and treatment planning. (C) 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Clinical Effects of Angle's Ⅱ1 Cases in Alignment with Incognito System

Clinical Efficacy of Counterclockwise Rotating the Functional Occlusal Plane Using Micro-Implant Anchorage.

Clinical efficacy of clear aligner in non-extraction treatment of Angle Class Ⅱ division 2 malocclusion

Clinical Effect of Tip-Edge Plus Appliance in Children with Angle II(1) Malocclusion.

[Three-dimensional finite element study on the effects of maxillary anterior two-step retraction and en-masse retraction with clear aligners]

Changes in the alveolar bone morphology among different patterns of incisor inclination during the alignment phase in orthodontic treatment without premolar extraction

The Clinical Experience of Treating AngleII1 Malocclusion of Early Permenant Dentition with Tip-Edge Appliance

Effectiveness of Clear Aligners in Achieving Proclination and Intrusion of Incisors among Class II Division 2 Patients: a Multivariate Analysis

The Effects of Incisor Inclination Changes on the Position of Point A in Class II Division 2 Malocclusion Using Three-Dimensional Evaluation: a Long-Term Prospective Study.

[Clinical Analysis of Two-Phase Treatment of 35 Cases with Angle Class II Division 1 Malocclusion].

Mesiodistal tip expression of mandibular anterior teeth in patients with mandibular incisor extraction treated with Invisalign aligners

Impact of Invisalign® first system on molar width and incisor torque in malocclusion during the mixed dentition period

A Pilot Clinical Study on Deep Bite Correction with Clear Aligner

Comparison Between the Designed and Achieved Mesiodistal Angulation of Maxillary Canines and Posterior Teeth and Influencing Factors: First Premolar Extraction Treatment with Clear Aligners

Changes of maxillary central incisor and alveolar bone in Class II Division 2 nonextraction treatment with a fixed appliance or clear aligner: A pilot cone-beam computed tomography study

Cephalometric evaluation of changes in vertical dimension and molar position in adult non-extraction treatment with clear aligners and traditional fixed appliances

Lower incisor position in skeletal Class III malocclusion patients: a comparative study of orthodontic camouflage and orthognathic surgery

Efficacy of invisible advancement correction for mandibular retraction in adolescents based on Pancherz analysis

[Comparison of clear aligners and customized lingual appliance for bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a retrospective study].

Mandibular advancement with clear aligners and functional appliances in the treatment of skeletal ClassⅡmalocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Changes in Anteroposterior Position and Inclination of the Maxillary Incisors after Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusions.