Abstract:Objectives: Aligners are an effective and esthetic orthodontic treatment option for permanent and mixed dentition. There are only a few studies dealing with the effectiveness of orovestibular tooth movement using aligners and applying adequate examination methods. In the present retrospective study, the aligner efficiency of orovestibular movements for the entire dentition was systematically evaluated using 3D superimposition, taking into account the influence of jaw, tooth type and Invisalign® system. Methods: Group 1 (n = 18 adults, Invisalign®) and Group 2 (n = 17 adolescents, Invisalign® Teen) were treated with Invisalign® Ex30 aligner material and Invisalign® specific auxiliary means. In this non-interventional retrospective study, pre- and post-treatment maxillary and mandibular plaster cast models were scanned and superimposed with ClinChecks® via Surface–Surface Matching Algorithm on unmoved teeth providing stable references. Effectivity of planned versus clinically realized movements was evaluated for each tooth. Statistics were performed with a t-test and Bonferroni–Holm correction (α = 0.05). Results: Orovestibular movement efficiency was excellent without statistical significance regarding jaw, tooth type or Invisalign® system. Mandibular translational tooth movements were highly effective, and outstanding for premolars (91–98%). Maxillary translational tooth movements were successful for incisors and premolars, but less effective for canines and molars. Almost all teeth were moderately or very effectively corrected by crown tipping, performing better for mandibular (70–92%) than maxillary (22–31%) canines as much as for adolescent upper front teeth (81–85%) and lower canines (92%). Conclusions: Aligners are able to effectively implement translational orovestibular movements, supported by tilting the crowns for even more efficient implementation of the movements. This phenomenon was observed in our studies for all teeth in both jaws, regardless of the Invisalign® system used. Treatment planning should nevertheless take into account the individual patient parameters with regard to the movements to be performed in order to make the aligner therapy as successful as possible in terms of realizing the desired therapeutic goal.

Orbital evolution for extreme mass‐ratio binaries: conservative self forces

Selective Topical Cooling for Myocardial Protection

Predictability of lower incisor tip using clear aligner therapy

Efficacy of Clear Aligners on Mandibular Molar Distalization: A Retrospective Study

Comparison of achieved and predicted tooth movement of maxillary first molars and central incisors: First premolar extraction treatment with Invisalign .

Comparison of Achieved and Predicted Crown Movement in Adults after 4 First Premolar Extraction Treatment with Invisalign

Efficacy of planned moderate to severe torque changes in mandibular central incisors with an initial series of Invisalign aligners: a retrospective cohort study

Comparison Between the Designed and Achieved Mesiodistal Angulation of Maxillary Canines and Posterior Teeth and Influencing Factors: First Premolar Extraction Treatment with Clear Aligners

Feedback from the EBF - Focus Workshop: bringing assay validation and analysis of biomarkers into practice.

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition

Clinical Effects of Angle's Ⅱ1 Cases in Alignment with Incognito System

How accurate is predicted root movement achieved in four first-premolar extraction cases with Invisalign?

Comparisons of maxillary incisor retraction effects for patients with first premolar extractions between Damon Q and Invisalign? A retrospective study

Assessing Aligner-Directed Tooth Movements and Exploring Inherent Intramaxillary Side Effects

Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique – regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization

How well does Invisalign ClinCheck predict actual results: A prospective study

[Three-dimensional finite element study on the effects of maxillary anterior two-step retraction and en-masse retraction with clear aligners]

Treatment Efficiency of Maxillary and Mandibular Orovestibular Tooth Expansion and Compression Movements with the Invisalign® System in Adolescents and Adults

The displacement of teeth and stress distribution on periodontal ligament under different upper incisors proclination with clear aligner in cases of extraction: a finite element study

The differential functions of imagery and verbal thought in insomnia.

Does age influence deep overbite correction with Invisalign? A prospective study evaluating mandibular incisor intrusion in adolescents vs adults