Comparison of bioactive glass spheres with three different sizes in repair of femoral condyle defects in rabbits

高鹏,王臻,张浩强,吴畅,刘云,肖鑫
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2015.02.016
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare bioactive glass spheres with 3 different sizes in terms of their osteogenic potential and biodegradation property for repair of femoral condyle defects in rabbits.Methods Defects of O.6 cm in diameter and 1.2 cm in depth were created in the bilateral femoral condyles of 24 adult New Zealand white rabbits before the animals were randomly assigned into 4 even groups (n =6).The 90 to 300 μm glass spheres were implanted in group A,301 to 500 μm spheres in group B,501 to 720 μm spheres in group C,and nothing in group D.Samples were harvested at 6 and 12 weeks after operation to measure new bone formation and the percentage of residual material in the area of bone defect.The osteogenic and biodegradation properties of the glass spheres were evaluated using quantitative histological analysis.Results At 6 weeks,new bone formation was observed in the implants in groups A,B and C but not in group D.Partial biodegradation was also observed in groups A,B and C.At 12 weeks,the amount of new bone obviously increased in groups A,B and C and all the 3 groups had greater new bone formation than group D.The amount of new bone in group A (35.25% ± 1.52%) was significantly greater than that in group B (22.42% ±1.86%) and in group C (21.26% ±1.36%) (P <0.05),but there was no significant difference between groups B and C (P > 0.05).The percentage of residual material in the area of bone defect in group A (13.77% ±0.47%) was significantly smaller than that in group B (20.52% ±0.82%) and in group C (20.00% ± 1.08%) (P < O.05),but there was no such a significant difference between groups B and C (P > 0.05).Conclusion Since bioactive glass spheres of 90 to 300 μm demonstrate better osteogenic potential and biodegradation property than those with the other 2 sizes,they can be used to effectively repair lacuna bone defects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?