Influence of Different Diameters Proximal Pedicle Vascular Perforator Flap on Survival Areas

张永祥,魏在荣,陈伟,吴必华,金文虎,张天华,孙广峰,聂开瑜
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0290.2016.05.013
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To observe the effects of different diameter perforator blood vessels and source artery on perforator flap survival areas in SD rats.Methods The 25 healthy SD rats were divid ed into four groups,5 each group:Group A:the right femoral artery perforator flap animal model;Group B:ligation of the right femoral artery to femoral biceps muscle branch flap animal model;Group C:the right femoral artery ligation in 1/2 perforator flap model;Group D:ligation of the perforating artery perforator flap model with diameter of 1/2;Group E:on the basis of C group,the 1/4 of the artery to the diameter was ligated.The flap maximum survival areas and PU values in different parts of the flap were detected.Results For the PU,groups A,B and C had significant difference (P<0.05);compared with group D,there was also significant difference among the groups A,B,C and E (P< 0.05);significant difference existed between groups C and D (P < 0.05) and between groups C and E (P<0.05).For the flap survival areas,compared with group D,there were significant differences among groups A,B,C and E (P<0.05).Conclusions The survival areas of perforator flaps with or without perforating artery make no differences,and have a relationship with the vascular structures and hemodynamics of the pedicle and the flap.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?