The Effect of Different Injection Layer of VEGF on Survival of a Random Flap in the Rat

于子莹,张茹慧,刘春丽,朱镇,刘志辉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7651.2002.06.005
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective:The puruose of the present study was to determine the effects of different injection layer of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) on survival of a full thickness random pattern,McFarlane musculocutaneous flap in the rats.In addition,this study examined the effects of different dose of VEGF on the flap viability.Methods:A2×8cm full thickness dorsal flap with the pedicle remaining attached at the posterior end was elevated in40 Wistar rats.The rats was randomised into three groups and received the following treatment: Group VEGF1( n =10): subdermal VEGF injection into the flap(200ng/ml) after flap elavation;Group VEGF2 ( n =10): topical injection onto the recipient bed (200ng/ml) after flap elavation;Group VEGF3 ( n =10): subfascial injection into the recipient bed (200ng/ml) after flap elavation.;Group Control( n =10):without any treatment after flap elavation.Results:After five days recovery,the area of flap survival was measured.Mean flap survival in Group Control was (10.52±1.14);Group VEGF1 was (13.39±2.71); Group VEGF2was (12.54±1.13);Group VEGF3 was(13.35±1.46).There was significant difference between Group VEGF123 and the CONTROL group ( P 0.05, P 0.01).Conclusions:These results support the notion that VEGF rescues tissue at risk of hypoxic damage by inducing angiogenesis nomatter subdermal injection,subfascial injection and topical injection onto the recipient bed;But subdermal injection and subfascial injection is better than topical injection on to the recipient bed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?