The Application of Lip Difference in the Evaluation of the Soft Tissue Change among Different Skeletal Malocclusions with Non-Surgical Treatment

陈慧中,苏红,韩冰,许天民
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5760.2017.01.001
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the validity of lip difference (Lip-Diff) in evaluating nonsurgical treatment effects among different skeletal malocclusion and to analyze the sensitivity of different soft tissue cephalometric values before and after treatment.Methods 2093 patients who had finished the treatment between 1997 to 2005 at Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology were selected,including 1051 Skeletal Class Ⅰ patients,851 Skeletal Class Ⅱ patients and 191 Skeletal Class Ⅲ patients.The cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after the treatments.Soft tissue analyses were measured to evaluate the soft tissue changes and to screen out the value with high sensitivity that can reflect treatment efficacy.Multiple linear regression was used to study the main factors that were related to the change of Lip-Diff.Results ① The difference of Lip-Diff expressed the most significantly in Skeletal Class Ⅲl group [pretreatment (-1.56±1.84) mm,posttreatment (0.11 ± 1.62) mm,P<0.05] and the difference of UL-E expressed the most significantly in Skeletal Class Iextraction group [pretreatment (0.80 ± 2.40) mm,posttreatment (-0.80± 2.12) mm,P < 0.05],non-extraction group [pretreatment (0.28 ± 2.44) mm,posttreatment (-0.07±2.15) mm,P<0.05] and Class Ⅱ group [pretreatment (3.06±2.44) mm,posttreatment (1.00 ± 2.21) mm,P<0.05] according to Multi factors discrimination analyzes.② Significant difference (P<0.05)was found between the Skeletal Class Ⅰ extraction group and the Skeletal Class Ⅰ non-extraction group in all measurements except nasal lip angle,LL-B'-Pos and A'LL-FH.③ The change in value of Lip-Diff in Skeletal Class Ⅲ group was mostly affected by the change of anterior overjet.Conclusions ① Lip-Diff was most valid in evaluating treatment efficacy of Skeletal Class]]][group,followed by Skeletal Class Ⅰ extraction group.However,Lip Diff was not sensitive in Skeletal Class Ⅱ][group and Skeletal Class Ⅰ non-extraction group.② Other factors,might be more valid in evaluations of other malocclusion types.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?