Abstract:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the anteroposterior (AP) position and inclination of the maxillary incisors in subjects with class I normal occlusion and a harmonious profile with patients with skeletal class III malocclusions, and to investigate the changes in maxillary incisor inclination and AP position after surgical-orthodontic treatment in class III patients.Material and methods: Sixty-five subjects (35 female and 30 male; mean age: 21.8 +/- 3.89 years) with normal profiles and class I skeletal and dental patterns were selected as a control sample. Sixty-seven patients (38 female and 29 male; mean age: 21.3 +/- 3.31 years) with skeletal and dental class III malocclusions who sought surgical-orthodontic treatment were used as the study sample. Subjects were asked to smile and profile photographs were taken with the head in a natural position and the maxillary central incisors and the forehead in full view; cephalograms were taken and superimposed on the profile pictures according to the outline of the forehead and nose. Forehead inclination, maxillary incisor facial inclination and the AP position of the maxillary central incisor relative to the forehead (FAFFA) were measured on the integrated images and statistical analyses were performed.Results: In both groups, there were no significant male/female differences in either the maxillary central incisor inclination or AP position. Female subjects had a significantly steeper forehead inclination compared with males (P < 0.001) in both groups. After combined surgical-orthodontic treatment, the significant labial inclination (P < 0.001) and posterior positioning (P < 0.001) of the maxillary central incisors had been corrected to close to normal range (P> 0.05). In the control group, 84.6% had the facial axial point (FA) of their maxillary central incisors positioned between lines through the forehead facial axis (FFA) point and the glabella. In the study group, however, 79.1% had the maxillary central incisors positioned posterior to the line through the FFA point and the difference with the control group was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The position of the maxillary central incisors was strongly correlated with forehead inclination in the control sample (r(2) = 0.456; P < 0.01), but only a poor correlation was detected in the class III group (r(2) = 0.177; P> 0.05).Conclusions: With the integrated radiograph photograph method, the lateral cephalogram was reoriented, which makes it possible to accurately measure the variables on profile photographs. The AP position and inclination of the maxillary central incisors relative to the forehead plays an important role in the esthetics of the profile during smiling and could be an important variable to be considered during diagnosis and treatment planning. (C) 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Lip profile changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion of varied growth patterns treated with maxillary premolar extractions: A pilot study

A Retrospective Study Comparing Nose, Lip, and Chin Morphology in Class I, Class II, and Class III Skeletal Relationships in Patients Visiting to the Department of Orthodontics, BPKIHS: A Cephalometric Study

Changes in the curvature of upper and lower lips following the first premolar extraction in Class I bimaxillary protrusion - A cephalometric study

Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study

Evaluation of Change in the Facial Profile and Aesthetics in Relation to Incisor Position in Both Maxillary and Mandibular Arches

Nasal profile changes after orthodontic tooth extraction in Class II, Division 1 malocclusion patients: a retrospective study

[Study of Chin Morphology in Angle Class II Division 2 Malocclusion after Non-Extraction Orthodontic Treatment].

Analysis of Facial Features and Prediction of Lip Position in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Adult Patients Undergoing Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment

Third molar angulation changes in Class II div I malocclusion subjects treated with extraction of four premolars: A retrospective study

The effectiveness of asymmetric extraction in treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions]

Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Chin Thickness in Adult Patients with Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Various Vertical Growth Patterns: a Cephalometric Study

The Study of Soft-Tissue Profile Changes in Patients with Class III Malocclusion after Premolar Extraction Therapy

Changes in Anteroposterior Position and Inclination of the Maxillary Incisors after Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusions.

Changes in smile parameters after surgical-orthodontic treatment for skeletal Class III malocclusion

THE CHANGES OF MANDIBULAR ROTATION AND LOWER ANTERIOR FACIAL HEIGHT IN DENTOSKELETAL ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT WITH MALOCCLUSION CLASS II/1 ANGLE

Analysis of soft tissue profile changes after mandibular advancement surgery

Perception of facial esthetics and cephalometric correlations in Class II patients: a comparison between two-phase and one-phase treatments

Changes of soft and hard tissues of patients with Angle classⅡdivision I malocclusion following orthodontic treatment with extraction

[Study of Facial Soft Tissue Profile on Angle Class II Malocclusion with Various Vertical Growth Patterns].

The Study of Soft Tissue Profile Ehanges and the Relationship with the Hard Tissue in the Adult Patients with Bimaxillary Prtrusion Treated with Premolar Extraction and Nance Arch

Facial soft tissue changes in adolescent patients treated with three different functional appliances: a randomized clinical trial