Clinical value of repeated peroral endoscopic myotomy for persistent/ recurrent achalasia

Gen Huang,Quanlin Li,Pinghong Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2019.11.003

2019-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of repeated peroral endoscopic myotomy (Re-POEM) as a make-up therapy after POEM failure. Methods Thirty-three patients with persistent / recurrent symptoms after first POEM (Eckardt symptom score≥4) were selected from a database of a total of 2516 consecutive patients with achalasia. The main outcome measures was Eckardt score during follow-up; the secondary outcome measures were procedure-related adverse events, changes in manometric lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, and reflux symptoms before and after Re-POEM. Results All patients successfully underwent Re-POEM in mean 18. 6 months (ranging 3-55 months) after their first POEM procedures. The mean symptom score before Re-POEM was 5. 5 (ranging 4-8). Mean operation time was 45. 1 minutes ( ranging 28-64 minutes). Submucosal tunnel infection occurred in 1 patient who recovered with conservative treatment. During a mean follow-up period of 36. 6 months (ranging 12-58 months), symptom relief was achieved in all patients. Eckardt score reduced to 1. 3 (ranging 0-3), significantly different from that before (P< 0. 001). Mean LES pressure also declined from 26. 0 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0. 133 kPa) to 9. 6 mmHg after Re-POEM (P<0. 001). The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux of Re-POEM was 33. 3％(11/ 33). Conclusions Re-POEM appears safe and effective as a make-up option after POEM failure.