Effect of Methyl Prednisolone on the Motor Function Recovery and Neurotrophic Factor Expression in Rats with Spinal Cord Injury
王华轶,陶圣祥,刘雷,李佐华,周益,邱建雄,巴正国,郑燮
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2017.02.029
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To observe the effect of methyl prednisolone on the motor function recovery and neurotrophic factor expression in rats with spinal cord injury (SCI).Methods A total of 90 Wistar rats were divided into normal control group,model control group,and methyl prednisolone group (n =30 each).The animals in the normal control group were given normal breeding,those in the model control group and methyl prednisolone group were given MYU spinal cord beat to establish the animal model of spinal cord contusion,and those in themethyl prednisolone group were given methyl prednisolone intervention additionally.The motor function recovery and neurotrophic factor expression were compared among the groups.Results The normal control group did not appear the rats died in the experiments,the model control group appeared 6 rats died.Methyl prednisolone group had 2 rats died,mainly due to the early urinary infection and urinary retention and lateappeared pressure ulcers.0 week postoperative,normal control group was (19.29 ± 2.06) score,and the rest groups were 0 score,at 4-8 weeks after operation,Basso—Beattie—Bresnahan (BBB) scored of model control group and methyl prednisolone group were obviously lower than that of normal control group (tmodel control group 4 weeks =51.230,tmethyl prednisolone group 4 weeks =34.581,tmodel control group 8 weeks =42.509,tmethyl prednisolone group 8 weeks =20.192,P =0.000).BBB scored of methyl prednisolone group was obvious higher than that of model control group,with statistical significance (t4 weeks =33.875,t8 weeks =25.864,P =0.000).After treatment,the nunber of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) positive cells (tmodel control group ventral horn =8.169,tmethylprednisolonegroupventralh =19.397,tmodel control group dorsal horn =5.456,tmethyl prednisolone group dorsal horn =8.583,P =0.000) and absorbance (A,tmodel control group ventral horn =4.693,tmethyl prednisolone group ventral horn =10.769,tmodel control group dorsal horn =4.457,tmethyl prednisolone group dorsal horn =9.870,P =0.000) of model control group and methylprednisolone group were significant higher than the normal control group.The number of BDNF positive cells (t l horn =13.962,tdosat horn =5.323,P =0.000) and A (tventral horn =7.120,tdorsal horn =6.794,P =0.000) of the methylprednisolone group were significant higher than that of model control group,the difference with statistical significance.Conclusion Methyl prednisolone can promote the motor function recovery,and improve the clinical symptoms in rats with SCI,which may be relate to the up-regulation of neurotrophic factors expressions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?