Abstract:Objectives Currently, most medical laboratories do not have a dedicated software for managing report recalls, and relying on traditional manual methods or laboratory information system (LIS) to record recall data is no longer sufficient to meet the quality management requirements in the large regional laboratory center. The purpose of this article was to describe the research process and preliminary evaluation results of integrating the Medical Laboratory Electronic Record System (electronic record system) laboratory report recall function into the iLab intelligent management system for quality indicators (iLab system), and to introduce the workflow and methods of laboratory report recall management in our laboratory. Methods This study employed cluster analysis to extract commonly used recall reasons from laboratory report recall records in the electronic record system. The identified recall reasons were validated for their applicability through a survey questionnaire and then incorporated into the LIS for selecting recall reasons during report recall. The statistical functionality of the iLab system was utilized to investigate the proportion of reports using the selected recall reasons among the total number of reports, and to perform visual analysis of the recall data. Additionally, we employed P-Chart to establish quality targets and developed a "continuous improvement process" electronic flow form. Results The reasons for the recall of laboratory reports recorded in the electronic recording system were analyzed. After considering the opinions of medical laboratory personnel, a total of 12 recall reasons were identified, covering 73.05 % (1854/2538) of the recalled laboratory reports. After removing data of mass spectra lab with significant anomalies, the coverage rate increased to 82.66 % (1849/2237). The iLab system can generate six types of statistical graphs based on user needs, including statistical time, specialty labs (or divisions), test items, reviewers, reasons for report recalls, and distribution of the recall frequency of 0–24 h reports. The control upper limit of the recall rate of P-Chart based on laboratory reports can provide quality targets suitable for each professional group at the current stage. Setting the five stages of continuous process improvement reasonably and rigorously can effectively achieve the goal of quality enhancement. Conclusions The enhanced iLab system enhances the intelligence and sustainable improvement capability of the recall management of laboratory reports, thus improving the efficiency of the recall management process and reducing the workload of laboratory personnel.

Australia Medical Laboratory Process and Its Reference to Chinese Medical Laboratories

The Application Evaluation of Clinical Decision Support in Auto-verification and Interpretation of Laboratory Test Results

Discussion about the Construction and Administration of Central Laboratory

A qualitative study on users′experience of intelligent laboratory test system

[Refined Management of the Second Class Warehouse and Cost-benefit Analysis for In-vitro Diagnostic Reagent].

Common Nonconformities and Corrective Actions in the Assessment of Clinical Immunology Laboratory with ISO15189 Medical Laboratory Accreditation

Opportunities and Challenges of Laboratory Medicine Based on Personalized Information in Precision ;Medicine

Brief talk about pediatric clinical laboratory medicine

The Management of Medical Laboratory during the Medical Postgraduates Training

Benchmarking medical laboratory performance on a global scale

Reflections on and Practice of Standardized Management of Fundamental Laboratory

Laboratory Data Dictionary and Laboratory Process Optimization

Improving regional medical laboratory center report quality through a report recall management system

Discussion and reflections based on the management mode of hospital laboratory

[Analysis of problems and management of in vitro diagnostic reagent clinical trials in medical laboratory]

The significance of a set of standardized analytical run in clinical tests with liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

Establishment on a laboratory physician-centred communication system

Pondering on the Development of Molecular Diagnostics in China

Ensure the accuracy and consistency of biochemical analyzer test results: Chemometrics for instrument and inter-instrument item comparison in Chinese hospital laboratory

InsPiration and Reference of Australian General practice Education Assessment System

A Survey about the Medical Quality Management of Clinical Department in A Hospital