Abstract:Importance: Treatment strategies for intermediate coronary lesions guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) have shown comparable outcomes. Identifying low-risk deferred vessels to ensure the safe deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and high-risk revascularized vessels that necessitate thorough follow-up can help determine optimal treatment strategies.Objectives: To investigate outcomes according to treatment types and FFR and IVUS parameters after FFR- or IVUS-guided treatment.Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study included patients with intermediate coronary stenosis from the Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial, an investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial that assigned patients into an IVUS-guided strategy (which recommended PCI for minimum lumen area [MLA] <= 3 mm2 or 3 mm2 to 4 mm2 with plaque burden [PB] >= 70%) or an FFR-guided strategy (which recommended PCI for FFR <= 0.80). Data were analyzed from November to December 2022.Exposures: FFR or IVUS parameters within the deferred and revascularized vessels.Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and revascularization at 2 years.Results: A total of 1619 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.1 [9.6] years; 1137 [70.2%] male) with 1753 vessels were included in analysis. In 950 vessels for which revascularization was deferred, incidence of TVF was comparable between IVUS and FFR groups (3.8% vs 4.1%; P = .72). Vessels with FFR greater than 0.92 in the FFR group and MLA greater than 4.5 mm2 or PB of 58% or less in the IVUS group were identified as low-risk deferred vessels, with a decreased risk of TVF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25 [95% CI, 0.09-0.71]; P = .009). In 803 revascularized vessels, the incidence of TVF was comparable between IVUS and FFR groups (3.6% vs 3.7%; P = .95), which was similar in the revascularized vessels undergoing PCI optimization (4.2% vs 2.5%; P = .31). Vessels with post-PCI FFR of 0.80 or less in the FFR group or minimum stent area of 6.0 mm2 or less or with PB at stent edge greater than 58% in the IVUS group had an increased risk for TVF (HR, 7.20 [95% CI, 3.20-16.21]; P < .001).Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis, FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies showed comparable outcomes in both deferred and revascularized vessels. Binary FFR and IVUS parameters could further define low-risk deferred vessels and high-risk revascularized vessels.

Intravascular Ultrasound Features of Intermediate Coronary Arterial Lesions and the Relationship of Fractalkine,cd36 and LP-PLA2 with Coronary Artery Stenosis

Application of Intravascular Ultrasound on Diagnosis and Treatment in Patients With Coronary Artery Intermediate Lesions

Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound Criteria for Defining the Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: an International Multicenter Study.

Clinical value of intravascular ultrasound imaging on guidance of interventional treatment for intermediate coronary lesions

Value of Intravascular Ultrasound Combined with Pressure Wire in Evaluating Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis

Assessment of mildly coronary stenosis by intravascular ultrasound imaging

Usefulness of Combined Intravascular Ultrasound Parameters to Predict Functional Significance of Coronary Artery Stenosis and Determinants of Mismatch

Characteristics and Value of Intravascular Ultrasound in Angiographic Intermediate Coronary Stenosis

Usefulness of Lumen Area Parameters Determined by Intravascular Ultrasound to Predict Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis

Role of Intravascular Ultrasound in Determining the Treatment Strategy for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis

Circulating Cd36 and Fractalkine Levels Are Associated with Vulnerable Plaque Progression in Patients with Unstable Angina Pectoris

Intravascular Ultrasonic Features of Unstable Atherosclerotic Plaques in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Comparative study on intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography in diagnosis and treatment of intermediate coronary stenosis

Evaluation of Vulnerable Plaques with Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients with Unstable Angina

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Clinical Decision-Making for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis

Physiology- or Imaging-Guided Strategies for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.

Clinical application value of intravascular ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment for intermediate lesions showed by coronary angiography

Intravascular ultrasound study on target lesion calcification

[Associations Between the Plasma Inflammatory Markers and Plaque Morphologies of Coronary Artery Lesions].

Assessment of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by IVUS-VH in patients with ACS

Optimized Quantitative Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Parameters Predicting the Functional Significance of Single De Novo Lesions in the Left Anterior Descending Artery.