Application of Cognitive Education in Esophageal High Resolution Manometry Examination
Yan Xiaoni,Yin Yan,Ren Xiaoyang,Lyu Jun,Yao Wanxia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2019.06.004
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the effect of cognitive education and behavioral intervention in solid-state high resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) examination. Methods From April 2016 to June 2017, 60 patients with solid-state HRM in the gastrointestinal motility room at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jiaotong University were as the research object. The 60 patients were divided into control group and experimental group with 30 cases each by the method of random numbers. The conventional methods was used in control group to conduct informed counseling before the examination and the coordination guidance in the examination. The conventional methods and cognitive behavioral intervention was used in experimental group at the same time. The successful rate of intubation, the time used for the examination, discomfort symptoms during intubation, the patient's satisfaction in the whole check process and self-evaluation of intubation pain experience in two groups of patients were compared. Results The time used in the experimental group examination was (28.50±8.75) min, and the control group was (33.13± 5.49) min. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t=2.584, P=0.015). In the experimental group, the number of nausea, vomiting, and coughing in the intubation process was 11, 0, and 1, respectively, and the control group was 20, 6, and 7, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.406, 4.630, 5.192, all P<0.05). In the experimental group, the scores of the 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, and 13 items of the intubation pain experience self-evaluation in the examination process were (1.00 ± 0.64), (1.37 ± 0.85), (2.80 ± 0.96), (1.50 ± 0.51), (0.87 ± 0.63), (0.77 ± 0.50), (0.60 ± 0.56), (1.07 ± 0.25), (0.57 ± 0.57), (1.50 ± 0.63) points, and the 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 and 13 scores of the control group they were (1.50 ± 0.51), (2.03 ± 0.76), (3.50 ± 0.82), (2.03 ± 0.76), (1.20 ± 0.61), (1.03 ± 0.41), (0.83 ± 0.53), (1.23 ± 0.43), (0.87 ± 0.57), (2.00 ± 1.05) points, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (t=-4.130--2.140, all P<0.05). Conclusions HRM is an important test before the clinical application of a wide range of clinical applications for the detection of esophageal motility disorders and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The degree of patient cooperation with the operation directly affects the high-resolution esophageal manometry test results and self-experience. Medical staff can give patients cognitive education and behavioral intervention before examination, which can effectively reduce the symptoms and pain caused by intubation, improve patient compliance, shorten the time for examinations, improve work efficiency, and improve patient satisfaction. It is worth further promotion and application in clinical examination.