Relation of Ocular Wavefront Aberrations and Visual Acuity at Different Contrast Levels Innatural Super Visual Acuity Eyes

CHENGZhen-ying,li jing-hai,CHU Ren-yua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2008.06.012
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the relation between ocular wavefront aberration and visualacuity at different contrast level in natural super visual acuity eyes.Methods 81 eyes of 81people with uncorrected visual acuity≥1.5 using Snellen visual acuity Chart were enrolled in thisstudy.Ocular aberration was measured using a Hartmann-Shack wavefront analyzer.Visual acuityat 100%,25%,and10%,and 5%contrast level under mesopic and scotopic condition was measuredusing a computer generated muti-function-visual-acuity analyzer.Linear correlation was used to analyze the relation between ocular wavefront aberration and visual acuity at different contrastlevel.Resuls Linear correlation;analysis revealed that the total aberration root-mean-square(RMS),the 2-7 order RMS,and each Zernike coefficient was not significantly correlated withvisual acuity at 100%,25%contrast level under mesopic and scotopic condition(P>0.05).Thetotal RMS,the 2nd order RMS,and tile delbcus coefficient was significantly correlated withvisual acuity at 10%,5%contrast level under mesopic and scotopic condition(P<0.01),and thecorrelation coefficient was-0.30,-0.35 and-0.28,-0.35:-0.33,-0.38 and-0.28,-0.39:-0.31,-0.3 and-0.28,-0.:39 respectively.The 3-7 order RMS,and the other Zernikecoefficient except defocus was not significantly correlated with visual acuity at 10%,5%contrastlevel under mcsopic and scotopic condition(P>0.05).Conclusions In natural surer visual acuityeyes,the ocular wavefront aberrations were not significantly correlated with visual acuity athigh contrast level,but were significantly correlated with visual acuity at low contrast levels.Thetotal aberration RMS,2rd order RMS,and defocus coefficient were more lower,the visual acuityat low contrast level were more better.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?