Transanal, Single Stage, Endorectal Pull Through for Hirschsprungʼs Disease in China
Ai-wu LI,Wen-tong ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00029330-200603010-00009
IF: 6.133
2006-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:In China, the first report on transanal posterior myotomy of internal sphincter for ultrashort aganglionosis was in 1997,1 while reports of the transanal, single stage, Soave for Hirschsprung's disease (HD) began to appear only after Torre's paper,2 published in 1998. The transanal endorectal pull through for HD was soon widely used by Chinese paediatric surgeons even in many provincial hospitals and local modifications frequently reported in the literature. From 2001 to 2004, 85 papers on transanal pull through for HD were published, and from 1999 to 2004, 252 patients underwent transanal endorectal operation for HD in our department. After reviewing the literature and analysing the clinical data, we discuss the present status and possible further developments of transanal, single stage, endorectal pull through for HD in China. BASAL ANESTHESIA PLUS CAUDAL BLOCK IS PREFERABLE FOR TRANSANAL PROCEDURE Inhalative or intravenous anaesthetization will relax the external sphincter but not the internal sphincter unless given deeply. General anaesthesia, resulting in deep depression of the central nervous system, will inevitably be more risky and more expensive. Basal anaesthesia in addition to caudal block anaesthesia provides a satisfactory relaxation of both external and internal sphincters in a quietly sleeping child.3,4 And, it has been widely used in China recently. Han et al5 made a comparison between two groups of 24 patients who underwent single stage transanal pull through procedure under basal anaesthesia plus caudal block (group A) or general anaesthesia (group B). It revealed that: in the caudal block group, there was perfect relaxation in 18 cases, acceptable relaxation in 6; while in the general anaesthesia group, perfect relaxation only in 4 cases, acceptable in 8, and poor in 12 cases. That research also revealed less fluctuation in blood glucose and cortisone levels in group A than in group B (P<0.05), indicating a smoother operative course under basal anaesthesia plus caudal block. THE CONVENTIONAL TRANSANAL SOAVE PULL THROUGH FOR HD IN CHINA As the conventional technique,6 Soave procedure has been used by many surgeons in China. Rectal mucosectomy begins at the level of 0.5 cm proximal to the dentate line and then extends upward including the whole length of the extraperitoneal rectum. The freed muscular cuff of the rectum is divided at its upper part, outside the mobilized mucosa. The residual mucosal stump with the diseased distal colon is further mobilized and transected at the level where the ganglion cells are proved normal by frozen section. The remaining normal colon is pulled through the rectal muscular cuff with a posterior split and sutured to the cut edge of anal mucosa at dentate line.7,8 Patients agreed with the good looking abdomen and less operative trauma, but complained of postoperative complications including mild enterocolitis, constipation and anastomotic stricture. Many patients need long term, anal dilatation.9 Zheng et al10 reported that two out of 14 cases who underwent this procedure had enterocolitis. Zhang et al11 performed 23 cases by this procedure, the average operating time was 137 minutes, blood loss was 30 ml and in one case, postoperative constipation was cured by anal dilatation for 6 months. VARIOUS MODIFICATIONS OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUES Modified transanal Soave pull through for HD by oblique anastomosis Instead of the diametral dissection at dentate line, an oblique rectal mucosectomy was made at 1 cm from dentate line on the posterior wall and 2 cm to 3 cm on the anterior wall from dentate line. So the anterior wall of the muscular cuff became shorter and the posterior wall was split like a “V”.12–14 Similarly, the pull through ganglionic colon is also cut obliquely and sutured to the obliquely cut edge of the anorectal mucosa. A shorter cuff seems to be beneficial in lessening the postoperative complications and the need of anal dilatation. Besides, the V shaped split of the muscular cuff gives more space for pull through colon to imitate the storage function of the ampulla of rectum.15 Gao et al12 reported 15 cases with no complications of faecal incontinence or constipation. Compare with Ma's experience, 3 out of 10 cases who underwent conventional Soave pull through for HD had postoperative enterocolitis.16 Transanal pull through with full-thickness oblique anastomosis By intrarectal route, the rectal wall was cut through in full thickness from interior. An oblique circumcision was made with its posterior margin just above the dentate line and the anterior margin 5 cm to 7 cm above. The peritoneal cavity being entered, the rectocolic stump was pulled out and transected obliquely at the normal colon. End to end oblique rectocolonic anastomosis was made transanally. This procedure avoided constipation and anastomotic stricture, and did not need anal dilatation. However, the risk of injuring the vessels and nerves around rectum might be increased.17 Zhou et al18 reported 26 cases which revealed that the average operating time was 170 minutes, blood loss was 30 ml to 50 ml, the resected colon was 16 cm to 22 cm, and 7 cases developed enterocolitis in the first month postoperatively, but no one had constipation. Transanal pull through of colon mobilized by supraperitoneal route In another modification of full thickness, end to end, oblique rectocolonic anastomosis, the peritoneal cavity was entered through an incision on the lateral rectal wall above the pelvic peritoneal reflection at pararectal pouch, which was reached by pulling the sigmoid downward by a series of traction sutures. The diseased colon was mobilized intraperitoneally and pulled out transanally until normal colon appeared. An oblique resection and anastomosis was made 3 cm above the dentate line on anterior wall and 1 cm above the dentate line on the posterior wall. This procedure was also good for avoiding anastomotic stricture. However, the blind dissection of extraperitoneal rectum might bring undesired injury. Xu et al19 reported 26 cases of HD. Among them, 22 cases underwent the above mentioned procedure. The average operating time was 110 minutes, blood loss was 20 ml and one case had faecal incontinence. The other 4 cases underwent the same procedure but the abdomen was entered through an incision on rectal wall below the peritoneal reflection. The average operating time was 150 minutes and the blood loss was 30 ml. Transanal pull through into the rectal cuff dissected in layers In Soave procedure, the mucosa was cut at 0.5 cm above the dentate line and dissected upward for 2 cm. Then the circular muscle layer was carefully cut from interior and dissected further above for 2 cm to 3 cm to expose the longitudinal muscle coat, which was preserved for 1 cm to 2 cm and finally transected into the pararectal pouch. This procedure made the thinner muscular cuff better for constipation and enterocolitis postoperatively. Hu et al20 operated on 10 patients by this method with no complication in 13 months follow-up. However, the dissection between layers of rectal wall was tedious and bloody. Laparoscopic assisted transanal pull through The procedure is indicated in long segment, colonic aganglionosis. It is safe to mobilize the colon under vision by laparoscopy. In addition, tissue samples for frozen section are more precise, especially in case of skipped segmental lesions.21 Gu et al22 reported 3 cases who underwent this procedure with no complications. Bowel function of holding and defecation was good by 3 months after operation. Transanal pull through combined with small cut laparotomy Xu et al23 reported 27 cases of long colonic aganglionosis who underwent a procedure in which the incision was much smaller than that of traditional laparotomy. The operation time was 100 minutes to 150 minutes and blood loss was 15 ml to 50 ml. After follow-up for 2 months to 12 months, 3 cases had adhesive ileus and one had bladder damage, but no faecal incontinence or constipation. Among the procedures, the modified transanal Soave pull through with oblique mucosectomy and anastomosis plus a short split of the muscular cuff has been the most popular procedure for HD in China. In the department, 140 cases underwent transanal Soave pull through with oblique anastomosis. There were 13 cases of enterocolitis, 6 of constipation and 5 anastomotic stricture receiving anal dilatation for 3 months. The other 112 cases underwent transanal conventional Soave procedure. There were 21 cases of postoperative enterocolitis, 12 of constipation and 11 anastomotic stricture receiving anal dilatation for 6 months. There was no difference between two groups in the operating time, blood lose or hospital stay. Critical aspects of success in transanal pull through: a colon stump The colonic stump to be pulled through transanally must maintain normal neural and blood supplies after it has been pulled down to the anal level through the narrow rectal cuff. The normal neural supply of the colon could be identified by X-ray barium enema study before operation or by frozen section for ganglion cells during the procedure. The normal blood supply of the pullout colon should be checked for complete absence of tension and of active bleeding of the end of the colonic stump. Postoperative colon retraction, anastomosis breaking and anal stricture were all due to poor blood supply and high tension.10 Gu et al22 used postoperative barium study in 19 cases. At 7th day after operation, the terminal of pullout colon appeared as a spastic lead tube, with bowel movement seven to ten times daily. Three months later, the colon became soft, started to dilate and imitated the normal rectum with bowel movement two to three times a day. In case of colon under tension, it would not soften to resume the storage function as a rectum. Similar to those in conventional open pull through procedures, surgical skill should also be the important factor, particularly in mucosectomy24 and treatment of mesenteric vessels.25,26 GENERAL IMPRESSION OF SINGLE STAGE TRANSANAL PULL THROUGH IN CHINA It has cosmetic benefits and is minimally invasive.10 In expert hands, minimal trauma in the peritoneal cavity lessens the development of paralytic ileus and peritoneal adhesion. The single stage procedure omits the traditional colostomy.11 In modified Soave, the mucosectomy is unlikely to damage the anal sphincter, and prevents damage to ureters, vas deferens and the pelvic nerves and vessels.27 Early postoperative feeding, short hospital stay, low cost and no abdominal scars are highly appreciated by family members.28 Shi et al 27 reported 47 cases and made comparisons between 3 groups. In group 1, 25 cases underwent Grob modified Duhamel procedure, the average operating time was 156 minutes, blood loss was 95 ml and the hospital stay was 12.6 days. There were 15 cases with perianal maceration, 2 cases with enterocolitis, 4 cases with anal stricture, 3 cases with soiling and 2 cases with adhesive ileus. In group 2, 6 cases underwent laparoscopic surgery. The average operating time was 234 minutes, blood loss was 15 ml, the hospital stay was 7.8 days. There was 1 case with anastomotic stricture. In group 3, 16 cases underwent transanal procedure. The average operating time was 90 minutes, blood loss was 25 ml and the hospital stay was 7.2 days. Only one case had faecal incontinence. Wang et al29 reported fifty-eight children (aged 12 months to 13 years), who underwent transanal single stage, endorectal pull through operation for HD. Forty-six patients had satisfactory results without complications. Postoperative soiling was present in 9, constipation in 5, and HD associated enterocolitis in 3. There was no incontinence, cuff infection, anastomotic leak or mortality in any of the patients. The clinical outcome is satisfactory. CURRENT INDICATIONS OF TRANSANAL PROCEDURE FOR HD Originally, transanal procedure for HD was considered suitable for infants, on whom the mucosectomy was easy.7,8,10 By and by, it was done on children of all ages,11 and it can be done for adults.30 The best age for the operation is at newborn period because nursing is difficult, the criteria for treatment such as intestinal lavage or intestinal stimulant are not satisfied, and the immediate need often necessitates the operation. The younger the patient operated, the faster the recovery of the stooling function.29 Most surgeons believe that transanal pull through should be the first choice for rectosigmoid aganglionosis. By laparoscopically assisting or combining with small incision laparotomy, transanal procedure could also be used in long colonic aganglionosis.22,23,30 The superiority of transanal procedure lies in its minimal invasive- ness, fewer postoperative complications and its cosmetic value. IMPORTANCE OF NURSING CARE AND REHABILITATION EDUCATION In transanal patients, postoperative morbidity is milder, but nursing care is essential. As in conventional pull through, nursing includes the preoperative colon preparation, postoperative perianal care, feeding consultation and psychological education. In the first postoperative month, the patients often have bowel movement about eight to ten times per day. Perianal maceration is one of the most common complications and relieving pain and keeping the perianal area dry are the main tasks. Bowel training education is crucial.31 The psychological education for bigger children and family members before and after surgery could help in getting better cooperation to achieve a successful treatment.32