Abstract:Objective: To investigate the endoscopic combined serological diagnosis strategy for G1 and G2 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (G-NENs), and to evaluate the safety, short-term, and long-term efficacy of two endoscopic treatment procedures: endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 100 consecutive patients with G-NENs who were hospitalized at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2011 to October 2023. These patients underwent endoscopic treatment, and propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare clinicopathological characteristics, as well as short-term and long-term efficacy of lesions in the EMR group and ESD group before and after treatment. Results: Among the 100 patients with G-NENs, the median age was 54 years old. Before surgery, 29 cases underwent endoscopic combined serological examination, and 24 of them (82.2%) had abnormally elevated plasma chromogranin A. The combined diagnostic strategy for autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AIG) achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 100%(22/22). A total of 235 G-NEN lesions were included, with 84 in the ESD group and 151 in the EMR group. The median size of the lesions in the ESD group (5.0 mm) was significantly larger than that in the EMR group (2.0 mm, P＜0.001). Additionally, the ESD group had significantly more lesions with pathological grade G2[23.8%(20/84) vs. 1.3%(2/151), P＜0.001], infiltration depth reaching the submucosal layer [78.6%(66/84) vs. 51.0%(77/151), P＜0.001], and more T2 stage compared to the EMR group[15.5%(13/84) vs. 0.7%(1/151), P＜0.001]. After PSM, 49 pairs of lesions were successfully matched between the two groups. Following PSM, there were no significant differences in the en bloc resection rate [100.0%(49/49) vs. 100.0%(49/49)], complete resection rate [93.9%(46/49) vs. 100.0%(49/49)], and complication rate [0(0/49) vs. 4.1%(2/49)] between the two groups. During the follow-up period, no recurrence or distant metastasis was observed in any of the lesions in both groups. Conclusions: The combination of endoscopy and serology diagnostic strategy has the potential to enhance the accuracy of diagnosing G1 and G2 stage G-NENs and their background mucosa. Endoscopic resection surgery (EMR, ESD) is a proven and safe treatment approach for G1 and G2 stage G-NENs.

Histologic Diagnostic Discrepancy Between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy and Endoscopic Resection for Gastric Intraepithelial Neoplasia

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional Forceps Biopsy Compared to ESD.

How Commonly is the Diagnosis of Gastric Low Grade Dysplasia Upgraded Following Endoscopic Resection? A Meta-Analysis.

Risk factors of pathological discrepancy between biopsy and excisional specimen from gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early gastric cancer

Risk factors for under-diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia and early gastric carcinoma in endoscopic forceps biopsy in comparison with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Chinese patients

The long-term outcome and risk factors of histologic discrepancy between forceps biopsies and endoscopic resections in early gastric cancer: An observational study

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Deep and Large Biopsy for Diagnosis of Gastric Infiltrating Tumors with Negative Malignant Endoscopy Biopsies

Comparative analysis of differences between preoperative endoscopic biopsy and postoperative pathological examination for diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia

Analysis of endoscopic features for histologic discrepancies between biopsy and endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric neoplasms: 10-year results

Potential Factors Predicting Histopathologically Upgrade Discrepancies between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy of the Colorectal Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Specimens

Clinical Study on Differential Diagnosis of Gastric Infiltrating Carcinoma from 82 Cases of Gastric High Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia

[Therapeutic Efficacy Analysis of Endoscopic Combined with Serological Diagnosis Strategy and Endoscopic in G1 and G2 Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms].

Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Rectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

The comparative study of pathology between preoperative endoscopic biopsy and endoscopic submucosal dissec-tion(ESD)in patients with gastroesophageal intraepithelial neoplasia

Diagnostic Ability of Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging for the Extent of Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pathological Features of Gastro-Esophageal High-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia: a Pre- and Post-Procedure Comparative Study

Endoscopic Features and Surgical Results of Gastric High-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Inter-observer Reproducibility in the Pathologic Diagnosis of Gastric Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Early Carcinoma in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Specimens: A Multi-center Study

Endoscopic Features Predictive of Gastric Cancer in Superficial Lesions with Biopsy-Proven High Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

What Is Most Important to the Endoscopist for Therapeutic Plan? Morphology versus Pathology: A Nationwide Multicenter Retrospective Study in Korea

Comparison of Pathological Results Between Preoperative and Postoperative Samples from Patients with Gastric Intraepithelial Neoplasia