Use of Quality of Life Scales in Evaluation of Life Qua Lity in Patients with Asthma

LI Fan,CAI Ying-yun,LI Hai-ling,XU Xiao-wen,LUO Yan-rong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2005.04.008
2005-01-01
BMJ
Abstract:Objective To compare the ef fi ciency of specific quality of life (QOL) scales in evaluation of the quality of life in patients with asthma with that of generic QOL instrument SF36 (the MOS 3 6-item short form health survey)Methods Totally, 48 pa tients of asthma were evaluated by the asthma quality of life questionnaire of s even scores and five scores (7-AQLQ and 5-AQLQ) , and SF36 at their initial vi sits and visits after treatment for two weeks and four weeks During the period of follow-up, their peak expiratory flow (PEF) were monitored daily and their asthma diaries were recordedResults The average PEF of 48 patients increased to 63% of the predicted measures in the 2-week and 66% in the 4-week from 55% in the initial visit (P005) Total scores increase d to 60 and 43 in the 2-week and 62 and 44 in the 4-week with 7-AQLQ and 5-AQLQ, respectively, from 55 and 40 in the initial visit, respectively (P001) Total scores of SF36 increased to 567 in the 2-week and 576 in the 4-week, respectively, from 549 in the initial visit, but without statistic al significance (P005)Coefficient of correlation between total scores o f AQLQ and PEF percentage of the predicted measures was significantly h igher than that between the scores of SF36 and PEF percentage of the predicted m easuresConclusion AQLQ was more sensitive than SF36 in evaluation of the quality of life in patients with asthma
What problem does this paper attempt to address?