Comparison of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preventing extubation failure in preterm infants: a Meta-analysis
Wenxing Li,Jun Tang,Chao Chen,Xia Qiu,Yan Yue,Yan Zeng,Yi Qu,Dezhi Mu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.02.008
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preventing extubation failure in preterm infants.Methods The English databases including PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,and Chinese databases including Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform,VIP database,and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched to collect randomized controlled trial (RCT) researches which compared the clinical effects of HHHFNC and NCPAP in preventing extubation failure in preterm infants.Preterm infants in HHHFNC group and NCPAP group were treated with HHHFNC and NCPAP modes,respectively.Retrieval time ranged from January 1,2000 to July 31,2018.Two reviewers independently screened literatures,evaluated the quality of the literatures,and extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this research.Then,Meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 12.0 software to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HHHFNC and NCPAP in preventing extubation failure in preterm infants.The main outcome measurements included efficacy indexes (rates of treatment failure and reintubation) and safety indexes (incidence rates of nasal trauma and frequent hemorrhoid).The secondary outcome measurements included in-hospital mortality rate and incidence rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD),necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC),patent ductus arteriosus (PDA),intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH),and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP),and the duration of reaching full enteral feedings.Results A total of 8 eligible RCT research literatures involving 1 037 preterm infants were included in the Meta analysis.Among them,there were 518 cases in HHHFNC group and 519 cases in NCPAP group.Meta-analysis showed the following results.① In terms of efficacy,there were no significant differences between two groups in the treatment failure rate (OR =1.18,95% CI:0.87-1.59,P=0.286) and reintubation rate (OR=0.93,95%CI:0.67-1.30,P=0.687).While in terms of safety,HHHFNC had a significant advantage over NCPAP in reducing the incidence rates of nasal trauma (OR=0.17,95%CI:0.11-0.26,P<0.001),and frequent hemorrhoid (OR=0.24,95%CI:0.09-0.63,P =0.003).②In terms of secondary outcome measurements,there were no significant differences between two groups in the in-hospital mortality rate (OR =0.93,95%CI:0.40-2.13,P =0.857),and incidence rates of BPD (OR=0.82,95%CI:0.60-1.11,P=0.202),IVH (OR=0.76,95%CI:0.46-1.27,P=0.299),ROP (OR=1.09,95%CI:0.69-1.73,P=0.713),PDA (OR=0.89,95%CI:0.62-1.28,P =0.524),and duration of reaching full enteral feedings (SMD =0.47,95% CI:-0.35-1.29,P =0.264).HHHFNC had a significant advantage over NCPAP in reducing the incidence rates of NEC (OR=0.56,95%CI:0.33-0.95,P=0.032).Conclusions HHHFNC appears to be similar to NCPAP in efficacy of preventing extubation failure in preterm infants.It is associated with significantly lower odds of nasal trauma,frequent hemorrhoid and NEC.However,it is recommended to be cautious as a preferred non-invasive ventilation mode to prevent extubation failure in preterm infants.