Influences of carbon nitride (CN), titanium nitride (TiN) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) thin film on the frictional property of stainless steel used in orthodontic treatment

Xiaomo Liu,Mengqi Zhang,Hongfei Shang,Jiuxiang Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5760.2019.01.003
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the frictional properties of stainless steel used in orthodontic treatment with surface modification of different alloy thin films. Methods CN Stainless steel which are used to made orthodontic wire are shaped to pieces with a diameter of 20mm and a 1mm thickness. Carbon nitride(CN) and Titanium nitride (TiN) film were deposited on these pieces by ion beam and Titanium dioxide (TiO2) film was deposited by sol-gel method. Frictional coefficients were measured by Universal Micro-Tribotester. Surface roughness(Sa) was measured by 3D white-light interfering profilometer. Each material was immersed in artificial saliva with Fluoride concentration of 0%, 0.05% and 0.1% for 3 days, and was measured for Frictional coefficient and Sa. The results were calculated and compared by t-test. Results The friction coefficient of as-received stainless-steel samples is: stainless steel 0.431±0.109, and the surface roughness (Sa) is 0.175±0.008 μm. The friction coefficient declined significantly after deposition of CN film and increased slightly after deposition of TiN film, but the roughness after both processes remained stable. The differences of frictional coefficient between the coatings and original stainless steel pieces were significant (P<0.001). The differences of frictional coefficient between the coatings and substrate were significant (P<0.001). After immersion in different concentrations of artificial fluoride saliva, the friction coefficient of TiN film increased. After 3-day immersion in artificial non-fluoride saliva, no significance was found in Sa in all three materials. TiO2, with weak adhesive strength and porous surface, was not applicable for friction coefficient test. Conclusions CN thin film would decrease the friction coefficient of stainless steel wire and could maintain a relative stable friction coefficient after immersion in fluoride saliva, and it can be a potential material used in future improvement of archwire propertie. Key words: Orthodontic; Stainless steel; Arch-wire; Surface modification; Friction coefficient
What problem does this paper attempt to address?