An Intervention Programme of Healthcare Management on Women with High-Risk of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
林华,陈新,朱秀芬,钱程,吴秋华,柳剑,沈玉梅,张国琴,杨莉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-0815.2009.06.005
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effects of an intervention programme of healthcare management, targeted to high-risk osteoporosis subjects and osteoporosis women. Methods Randomized controlled trial with one-year follow-up, carried out in the study. A total of 240 postmenopausal osteopenia women and 60 osteoporosis women were enrolled. The 240 postmenopausal osteopenia subjects were randomized to either the intervention group (A, n = 120) or the control group (B, n = 120), and 60 osteoporosis women were the intervention group (C, n =60). Group A and C: Education program performed once a season for the intervention group, at baseline, the intervention group was given general information about lifestyle and osteoporosis risk. This was done either individually or in one group session (30 min to 1 h), and some printed material was delivered. The message included healthy and balanced diet, exposure to sunlight (30m-2h/d, and more than 8h/w), and respect to physical fitness (30m-1h/d, and more than 3-5 times/w), and supplement calcium 600mg and VitD 125IU daily. Group B: non-intervention controls. Follow- up meetings with doctor were conducted monthly there after. Primary outcomes were anthropometry and changes in levels of health knowledge, health attitude and health practice (KAP). The secondary outcomes were changes in Bone mineral density (BMD). During one year of intervention, BMD was measured by DXA on lumbar spine and proximal femur at pre-intervention, 6 months and 12months after intervention. Results After one year, 229 subjects completed the follow-up. The levels of KAP in the intervention groups (A and C) increased significantly. There were significant differences between group A and group B: BMD on lumbar spine (0.890±0.142) g/cm2, (0.855±0.138)g/cm2, P =0.0459, and the changes of BMD on lumbar spine (0.025±0.069/-0.003±0.095, P = 0.0016) and total hip (0.015 ±0.105/-0.004±0.096, P = 0.0217). In the group C, intervention with healthcare management resulted in no significant improvements in BMD both on lumbar spine and total hip. Conclusion Healthcare management with a focus on health education and health lifestyle counseling followed by structured follow-up meetings can favorably influence several risk factors for osteoporosis and quality of life in high-risk osteoporosis subjects for at least one year. But for osteoporosis women, there was no significant difference of BMD both on lumbar spine and total hip compares pre-intervention after one year.