The application of objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) for evaluating clinical internship in internal medicine
Miao Yang,Yao Liu,Yuhan Dong,Yang Ding,Zhibing Lu,Miao Yu,Xingxing He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3326588/v1
2023-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background Clinical internship plays a vital role in enhancing medical students' theoretical knowledge, clinical operational abilities, and clinical thinking development. This study aims to establish an efficient evaluation system to assess interns' proficiency of clinical skills, and analyze the teaching effectiveness of clinical internships. Methods A total of 75 candidates from a 5 + 3 integrated medical training program, who had already completed a three-month clinical internship in internal medicine, participated in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Four stations during the OSCE included history taking, abdominal physical examination, thoracentesis, and interpretation of auxiliary examination results. Both candidates and examiners voluntarily completed anonymous questionnaires immediately after the OSCE. Results were analyzed using the Chi-square test and the t -test as appropriate. Results In history taking station, new examiners awarded significantly higher scores compared to examiners with experience in conducting examinations (t = 1.711, P < 0.05). "5 + 3" candidates scored significantly higher than eight-year candidates in physical examination and thoracentesis station (t = 5.316 and t = 2.145, respectively; both p < 0.05). According to the questionnaire survey, the majority of candidates and all examiners were quite satisfied with its design, organization, quality and effectiveness. More than half of the candidates and examiners believed that insufficient practice and inadequate preparation for revision were the factors most likely to affect performance. 75% of the examiners felt that candidates needed the most training in operative steps and content, but only 56% and 40% of the candidates agreed with this view. Furthermore, 56% of candidates and half of the examiners identified operational methods and humanistic care as areas that still required intensive improvement. Conclusions This examination is an effective attempt to construct an OSCE evaluation system for the skills of medical students in the internship stage. This system can objectively and comprehensively reflect the students' clinical skills, promote the realization of evaluation feedback and quality management of clinical internship teaching, which can be promoted in the evaluation of clinical internship.