The predictive value of atrial synchronization for recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients by dual gate Dopper

Yanxiang Zhou,Sheng Cao,Jinling Chen,Bo Hu,Qing Zhou,Ruiqiang Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2017.11.010
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To discuss whether atrial synchronization measured by dual gate Dopper can predict recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation ( RFCA) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF) patients . Methods Forty-five patients with PAF who had successful RFCA and 26 controls with sinus rate were prospectively enrolled . During 6-month follow-up , the patients with PAF were divided into AF recurrence group ( n = 16) and AF non-recurrence group ( n = 29) . All patients with PAF underwent echocardiography in the preoperative 7 days . The time interval of the onset of the late diastolic ( a′) wave between mitral annular septal and lateral site was T 1 by dual gate Doppler ,which was used to evaluate left atrial synchronization . The time intervals from the onset of a′ wave at tricuspid annulus right ventricular free wall site to a′wave at tricuspid annular septal site and mitral annular lateral site were T 2 and T3 ,which were respectively used to evaluate right atrial and interatrial synchronization . The greater time interval predicted the worse synchronization . Results Compared with controls ,left atrial diameter ,volume and volume index ,right atrial transverse diameter ,volume and volume index ,T 1 ,T2 and T3 ( standardized before and after) increased in patients with PAF ( all P <0 .05) . In patients with PAF ,left atrial volume index and T2 ( standardized before and after) had no differences between AF recurrence group and AF non-recurrence group( P >0 .05) . But there was a trend toward lager left atrial diameter in the AF recurrence group ( P < 0 .05) . T1 and T3 ( standardized before and after) increased significantly in AF recurrence group (all P < 0 .05) . Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated standardized T 1 was the only independent predicator of AF recurrence after RFCA ( OR = 1 .060 ,95% CI 1 .002 -1 .121 , P = 0 .044) . The area under curve of standardized T1 for predicting recurrence was 0 .709% , the sensitivity and specificity were 62 .5% and 75 .9% using a cutoff value of standardized T1≥39 .38 ms . Conclusions T1 significantly prolongs in patients with AF recurrence . Dual gate Doppler as a new technique to evaluate atrial synchronization can provide predictive value for 6-month recurrence after RFCA .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?