Abstract:The CIELAB lightness and chroma values of pixels in five of the eight ISO SCID natural images were modified to produce sample images. Pairs of images were displayed on a calibrated monitor and assessed by a panel of 12 observers with normal color vision using a categorical judgment method. The experimental results showed that assuming the lightness parametric factor k(L)=1 to predict color differences in images, CIELAB performed better than CIEDE2000, CIE94, or CMC, which is a different result to the one found in color-difference literature for homogeneous color pairs. However, observers perceived CIELAB lightness and chroma differences in images in different ways. To fit current experimental data, a specific methodology is proposed to optimize k(L) in the color-difference formulas CIELAB, CIEDE2000, CIE94, and CMC. From the standardized residual sum of squares (STRESS) index, it was found that the optimized formulas, CIEDE2000(2.3:1), CIE94(3.0:1), and CMC(3.4:1), performed significantly better than their corresponding original forms with lightness parametric factor k(L)=1. Specifically, CIEDE2000(2.3:1) performed the best, with a satisfactory average STRESS value of 25.8, which is very similar to the 27.5 value that was found from the CIEDE2000(1:1) formula for the combined weighted dataset of homogeneous color samples employed at the development of this formula [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A25, 1828 (2008), Table 2]. However, fitting our experimental data, none of the four optimized formulas CIELAB(1.5:1), CIEDE2000(2.3:1), CIE94(3.0:1), and CMC(3.4:1) is significantly better than the others. Current results roughly agree with the recent CIE recommendation that color difference in images can be predicted by simply adopting a lightness parametric factor k(L)=2 in CIELAB or CIEDE2000 [CIE Publication 199:2011]. It was also found that the different contents of the five images have considerable influence on the performance of the tested color-difference formulas.

Color Discrimination Metric Based on the Neutrality of Lighting and Hue Transposition Quantification.

Color Discrimination Metric Based on Cone Cell Sensitivity.

Colour Discrimination Scores Combining Colour Fidelity and Gamut Area Characteristics

Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.

Gamut Volume Index: A Color Preference Metric Based on Meta-Analysis and Optimized Colour Samples

Towards an optimum colour preference metric for white light sources: a comprehensive investigation based on empirical data

Development of the Ies Method for Evaluating the Color Rendition of Light Sources

New Metrics for Evaluating Whiteness of Fluorescent Samples

White Lighting and Colour Preference, Part 1: Correlation Analysis and Metrics Validation

Perceived Assessment Metrics for Visible and Infrared Color Fused Image Quality Without Reference Image

The Prediction of Perceived Colour Differences by Colour Fidelity Metrics

Color Difference Evaluation for Wide-Color-gamut Displays.

Numerical correlation between non-visual metrics and brightness metrics-implications for the evaluation of indoor white lighting systems in the photopic range

Evaluation of Whiteness Metrics

The Whiteness of Lighting and Colour Preference, Part 2: A Meta-Analysis of Psychophysical Data

What Do We Need for Assessing Whiteness?

Human Perceptions of Colour Rendition at Different Chromaticities

Evaluation of Threshold Color Differences Using Printed Samples.

The Llab Model For Colour Appearance And Colour Difference Evaluation

Review of Measures for Light-Source Color Rendition and Considerations for a Two-Measure System for Characterizing Color Rendition.

White Appearance and Chromatic Adaptation on a Display under Different Ambient Lighting Conditions