Abstract:The ability to predict the timing of forthcoming events, known as temporal expectation, has a strong impact on human information processing. Although there is growing consensus that temporal expectations enhance the speed and accuracy of perceptual decisions, it remains unclear whether they affect the decision process itself, or non-decisional (sensory/motor) processes. Here, healthy human participants (N = 21; 18 female) used predictive auditory cues to anticipate the timing of low-contrast visual stimuli they were required to detect. Modeling of the behavioral data using a prominent sequential sampling model indicated that temporal expectations speeded up non-decisional processes but had no effect on decision formation. Electrophysiological recordings confirmed and extended this result: temporal expectations hastened the onset of a neural signature of decision formation but had no effect on its build-up rate. Anticipatory α band power was modulated by temporal expectation and co-varied with intrinsic trial-by-trial variability in behavioral and neural signatures of the onset latency of the decision process. These findings highlight how temporal predictions optimize our interaction with unfolding sensory events.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Temporal expectation enhances performance, but the locus of this effect remains debated. Here, we contrasted the two dominant accounts: enhancement through (1) expedited decision onset, or (2) an increase in the quality of sensory evidence. We manipulated expectations about the onset of a dim visual target using a temporal cueing paradigm, and probed the locus of the expectation effect with two complementary approaches: drift diffusion modeling (DDM) of behavior, and estimation of the onset and progression of the decision process from a supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal in simultaneously measured EEG signals. Behavioral modeling and neural data provided strong, converging evidence for an account in which temporal expectations enhance perception by speeding up decision onset, without affecting evidence quality.

Temporal expectation driven by rhythmic cues compared to that driven by symbolic cues provides a more precise attentional focus in time

When temporal attention interacts with expectation

Temporal Expectation Hastens Decision Onset But Does Not Affect Evidence Quality

Enhancing rhythmic temporal expectations: The dominance of auditory modality under spatial uncertainty

Does Attention Control Affect Rhythmic Temporal Expectation?

Distinguishing expectation and attention effects in processing temporal patterns of visual input

The Cognitive and Neural Mechanism of Temporal Expectation

Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention

Rhythm-based Temporal Expectations: Unique Contributions of Predictability and Periodicity

Purpose-Dependent Consequences of Temporal Expectations Serving Perception and Action

Immediate Temporal Information Modulates the Target Identification in the Attentional Blink

EXPRESS: Influences of Temporal and Probabilistic Expectation on Subjective Time of Emotional Stimulus

Effect of tempo on the age-related changes in temporal expectation driven by rhythms

The Effect of Phasic Alertness on Temporal Precision

Spatial prediction modulates the rhythm of attentional sampling

Temporal Attention Affects Contrast Response Function by Response Gain

Temporal attention selectively enhances target features

Eyes on the past: Gaze stability differs between temporal expectation and temporal attention

The modulation of temporal predictability on attentional boost effect

α oscillations related to anticipatory attention follow temporal expectations

Temporal expectation makes our action more cautious: Evidence from unconscious processing