A simple and practical criterion for determining a failed His-bundle pacing.

Yanchun Liang,Na Wang,Haibo Yu,Baige Xu,Xiaolei Yan,Min Wu,Yang Gao,Rong Liu,Guoqing Xu,Zhenhui Li,Jiaqi He,Zulu Wang,Yaling Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa244

2020-01-01

Abstract:AIMS:To establish a simple criterion for determining a failed His-bundle pacing (HBP). This criterion states that if stimulus to QRS end interval is longer than His-bundle potential to QRS end interval ('S-QRSend > H-QRSend') then a failed HBP can be determined. METHODS AND RESULTS:We performed retrospective analysis on 737 pacing tests around His-bundle in 241 patients and prospective analysis on 400 tests in 123 patients. A successful HBP is defined as that whole His-bundle is captured with or without capture of adjacent ventricular myocardium, otherwise, a failed HBP was considered. The output criteria and effective refractory period criteria were used as the gold standards for determining a successful HBP. The gold standards are that if decreasing the pacing output or pacing cycle length to a certain level results in duration or morphology changes of QRS, then a successful HBP is ascertained. In retrospective analysis of patients with normal His-Purkinje conduction, a failed HBP was determined in 31% (154/492) of pacing tests according to 'S-QRSend > H-QRSend'; all of them were validated by the gold standards (specificity = 100%). In prospective study, a failed HBP was confirmed according to the simple criterion with 100% accuracy in 33% (79/241) pacing tests. This simple criterion was also suitable for patients with His-Purkinje conduction disease although cases with 'S-QRSend > H-QRSend' rarely occurred. CONCLUSION:A failed HBP can be easily and reliably determined solely by 'S-QRSend > H-QRSend' in more than 30% pacing tests.