Abstract:Two centrifuge models with the same relative density were conducted in different centrifugal acceleration (30 g for Model-A and 15 g for Model-B) at Zhejiang University to validate generalized scaling law in LEAP-ASIA-2018. The same model used in LEAP-UCD-2017 representing a 5-degree slope consisting of saturated Ottawa F-65 was repeated. The bending disk was installed to check the degree of saturation and the temperature-fluid viscosity curves also measured in the experiment. This paper describes the facilities, test procedures, and the response of acceleration, excess pore water pressures and displacement etc. Uncertainty analysis is also carried out in input parameters (e.g. achieved PGA, achieved density and the degree of saturation). Preliminary ZJU experiment results show that the generalized scaling law is applicable to the acceleration response while a weak applicability to displacement response. 1 . I n t r o d u c t i o n LEAP (Liquefaction Experiments and Analysis Project) is an international effort, which aimed to provide a set of high quality laboratory and centrifuge test data to assess the capabilities of constitutive and numerical models (e.g. Kutter et al. 2015, Manzari et al. 2015). The results of LEAP-Kyoto-2013 and 2014 showed some inconsistency between different centrifuge tests due to the differences of laminar containers, which caused challenges for numerical simulations (Tobita et al. 2015). Therefore, rigid boxes were adopted in LEAP-GWU-2015 to avoid the numerical modeling complexities associated with the special boundary conditions created by different types of laminar containers. Several numerical simulations also conducted in LEAP-GWU-2015, showing great consistencies with experimental tests. Kutter et al. (2015) compared the results from different centrifuge facilities and found larger differences than ideal due to variability of input parameters (i.e., density, fabric, saturation etc.). In summary of LEAP-GWU-2015, Kutter et al. (2017) suggested that more rigorous site investigation should be used to determine the density and saturation of the soils (such as in-fight CPT testing). New methods such as high-speed cameras with PIV analysis are also recommended to for tracing dynamic surface lateral displacement. Thus, better practical experimental technology and measuring techniques were adopted in LEAP-UCD-2017, including in-fight CPT testing for estimating soil density, high-speed camera for tracing marker displacement as well as shear-wave velocity for detecting initial state of the model (Zhou et al. 2017). In LEAP-ASIA-2018, two centrifuge models were conducted at Zhejiang University to validate generalized scaling law. Large geotechnical centrifuge ZJU-400, uniaxial hydraulic shaker and advanced in-flight Bender Element (BE) system, other unique techniques, including a two-dimensional in-flight miniature CPT system, Bending Disk system (BD) and high-speed camera were also used in Zhejiang University in LEAP-ASIA-2018. Zhejiang University rigorously followed the specifications and procedures and gained reliable results. The achieved density of two models are closed to the target and the achieved Sr > 99.5%. The input motion was well controlled and the effective PBA matched the target one. This paper describes the facilities and test procedures, uncertainty analysis is carried out in input parameters and some preliminary experimental results are discussed as well, which is contribute to further researchers to understand the experimental benchmark data of Zhejiang University in LEAP-ASIA-2018. 2 . T e s t F a c i l i t i e s a n d S p e c i f i c a t i o n s 2.1 Test facilities The LEAP-ASIA-2018 tests of Zhejiang University were performed by using the ZJU-400 centrifuge with in-fight uniaxial shaker and bender element (BE)/bending disk (BD) testing system, which was detailed introduced in Zhou et al. (2017). The same rigid model container was used as LEAP-UCD-2017, which had the inner dimension of 770 mm long, 400 mm wide and 500 mm deep. The container was shortened to 666 mm in length to match the prototype specification of 20 m in length. The supporting blocks are 52 mm thick aluminum plate, which is braced at six locations and bolted to the end walls of the container, illustrated in Figure 1. The blocks are well sealed to prevent drainage along the aluminum container interfaces. A two-dimensional miniature CPT system used in LEAP-UCD-2017 was applied to evaluate the uniformity and density of the soil models before each destructive motion. The CPT system includes the cone penetrometer with a cone tip 6 mm in diameter and apex angle of 60° (Liu et al., 2018). 2.2 Model Geometry and Instrumentation Layout In prototype, the models conducted in LEAP-ASIA-2018 represents a 5-degree, 4 m deep at midpoint, 20 m long sand slope deposit of Ottawa F-65. The soil surface normal to slope direction was not curved according to the radius of the centrifuge because the shaking direction is parallel to the axis of the centrifuge. Figure 1 illustrated the instrumentation locations in the model. There were 4 horizontal accelerometers (AH1-AH4) and 4 pore pressure transducers located at the midpoint along the shaking direction to minimize the boundary effects from the rigid walls. Two additional accelerometers (AH11 and AH12) were attached on the bottom of container to record the achieved base motion. Two vertical accelerometers were installed at the top of the container to monitor vertical and rocking accelerations. Another 4 horizontal accelerometers and 2 pore pressure transducers (AH6, AH7, AH9 and AH10; P6, P8-P10) were included at equivalent depths as sensors in the central array and were intended to help in understanding the effect of the container boundaries on the model response. Three pairs of bender elements, at the depth of 1 m, 2 m, and 3 m respectively, were placed to measure vertically polarized and horizontal travelling SV shear-wave velocity. A pare of bending disks were also installed to measure P-wave velocity after model saturation. Surface markers were placed on the surface of the soil to trace the deformation during soil liquefaction. The specified surface markers were red shown in Figure 2, which made by a 10 mm length, 25 mm in diameter PVC tube with an aluminum cross bar fixed in center. The black surface markers made of zip ties were also employed and all the surface markers were installed in a 50 mm×50 mm grid (model scale). 12 colored (blue) sand columns were used to curve lateral spreading profile by excavation after the final spin down. Five high-speed cameras (GoPro cameras) were installed on the camera frame to record the lateral displacement of surface markers on different regions of the model during spinning. The finished model photographed in Figure 2. P1 AH3 P2 P3 P4 AH2 AH4

Difference and Sensitivity Analyses of the LEAP-2017 Experiments

Liquefaction Experiment and Analysis Projects (LEAP): Summary of Observations from the Planning Phase

Large Deformation Finite-Element Simulation of Displacement-Pile Installation Experiments in Sand

LEAP-GWU-2015 Experiment Specifications, Results, and Comparisons

Stress-strain response of the LEAP-2015 centrifuge tests and numerical predictions

LEAP-2017 Simulation Exercise: Calibration of Constitutive Models and Simulation of the Element Tests

LEAP-ASIA-2019: Validation of centrifuge experiments and the generalized scaling law on liquefaction-induced lateral spreading

Numerical analysis of LEAP centrifuge tests on sloping liquefiable ground: Influence of dilatancy and post-liquefaction shear deformation

LEAP-2017: Comparison of the Type-B Numerical Simulations with Centrifuge Test Results

Centrifuge Model Test at Zhejiang University for LEAP-ASIA-2018

Zhejiang University Benchmark Centrifuge Test for LEAP-GWU-2015 and Liquefaction Responses of a Sloping Ground

Shear Wave Velocity-Based Evaluation of Cyclic Mobility Type of Liquefaction and Validation by Centrifuge Model Tests in LEAP

Correlation of CPT measurements and relative density of LEAP-2017 and LEAP-2020 centrifuge models

Liquefaction in the presence of soil-structure interaction: Centrifuge tests of a sheet-pile quay wall in LEAP-2020

Revisit Of The Empirical Prediction Methods For Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spread By Using The Leap Centrifuge Model Tests

Remarks on numerical simulation of the LEAP-Asia-2019 centrifuge tests

Modeling cyclic liquefaction and system response of a sheet-pile supported liquefiable deposit: Insights from LEAP-2022

A modified pressure dependent multi-yield surface model for simulation of LEAP-Asia-2019 centrifuge experiments

Numerical Simulation For Site Seismic Response Of Centrifuge Model Test Considering Effect Of Additional Attenuation Of G(Max)

Assessment of soil constitutive models for predicting seismic response of sheet pile walls: A LEAP-2022 project study

Numerical modeling of LEAP-2017 liquefiable sloping ground centrifuge tests using the ISA-hypoplasticity model