Transmission Via Aerosols: Plausible Differences among Emerging Coronaviruses

Jingkun Jiang,Yu Vincent Fu,Li Liu,Markku Kulmala

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1769020

2020-01-01

Aerosol Science and Technology

Abstract:The global COVID-19 pandemic has given rise to discussions on airborne transmission of coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV-2 (Lewis 2020). Asadi et al. (2020) and Drossinos and Stilianakis (2020) provid...

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Transmission of Coronavirus via Aerosols and Influence of Environmental Conditions on Its Transmission

邓建国,王东滨,李雪,蒋靖坤,贺克斌,郝吉明

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202010033

2021-01-01

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic has endangered human health and production since 2019. As an emerging disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, its potential transmissibility via aerosols has caused heated debate. This work summarizes the current research findings on virus aerosol generation, aerodynamic properties, and environmental influencing factors on their survivability in order to elucidate coronavirus transmission via aerosols. The occurrence and distinction of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1, and MERS-CoV in real atmospheric environments are summarized. The deficiencies of existing research and directions for necessary future research on confirming the airborne transmission mechanism of coronavirus as well as the need for multidisciplinary research are discussed.
Aerosol Transmission of Coronavirus and Influenza Virus of Animal Origin

Jing Lv,Jing Gao,Bo Wu,Meiling Yao,Yudong Yang,Tongjie Chai,Ning Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.572012

IF: 3.471

2021-04-13

Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Abstract:Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused great harm to global public health, resulting in a large number of infections among the population. However, the epidemiology of coronavirus has not been fully understood, especially the mechanism of aerosol transmission. Many respiratory viruses can spread via contact and droplet transmission, but increasing epidemiological data have shown that viral aerosol is an essential transmission route of coronavirus and influenza virus due to its ability to spread rapidly and high infectiousness. Aerosols have the characteristics of small particle size, long-time suspension and long-distance transmission, and easy access to the deep respiratory tract, leading to a high infection risk and posing a great threat to public health. In this review, the characteristics of viral aerosol generation, transmission, and infection as well as the current advances in the aerosol transmission of zoonotic coronavirus and influenza virus are summarized. The aim of the review is to strengthen the understanding of viral aerosol transmission and provide a scientific basis for the prevention and control of these diseases.

veterinary sciences
On Airborne Transmission and Control of SARS-Cov-2

Maosheng Yao,Lu Zhang,Jianxin Ma,Lian Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139178

IF: 9.8

2020-01-01

The Science of The Total Environment

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic is creating a havoc situation across the globe that modern society has ever seen. Despite of their paramount importance, the transmission routes of SARS-Cov-2 still remain debated among various sectors. Evidences compiled here strongly suggest that the COVID-19 could be transmitted via air in inadequately ventilated environments. Existing experimental data showed that coronavirus survival was negatively impacted by ozone, high temperature and low humidity. Here, regression analysis showed that the spread of SARS-Cov-2 was reduced by increasing ambient ozone concentration level from 48.83 to 94.67 mu g/m(3) (p-value= 0.039) and decreasing relative humidity from 23.33 to 82.67% (p-value= 0.002) and temperature from-13.17 to 19 degrees C) (p-value = 0.003) observed for Chinese cities during Jan-March 2020. Besides using these environmental implications, social distancing and wearing a mask are strongly encouraged to maximize the fight against the COVID19 airborne transmission. At no other time than now are the scientists in various disciplines around the world badly needed by the society to collectively confront this disastrous pandemic. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Aerosol Transmission of SARS-CoV-2? Evidence, Prevention and Control

Song Tang,Yixin Mao,Rachael M. Jones,Qiyue Tan,John S. Ji,Na Li,Jin Shen,Yuebin Lv,Lijun Pan,Pei Ding,Xiaochen Wang,Youbin Wang,C. Raina MacIntyre,Xiaoming Shi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106039

IF: 11.8

2020-01-01

Environment International

Abstract:As public health teams respond to the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), containment and understanding of the modes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission is of utmost importance for policy making. During this time, governmental agencies have been instructing the community on handwashing and physical distancing measures. However, there is no agreement on the role of aerosol transmission for SARS-CoV-2. To this end, we aimed to review the evidence of aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Several studies support that aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is plausible, and the plausibility score (weight of combined evidence) is 8 out of 9. Precautionary control strategies should consider aerosol transmission for effective mitigation of SARS-CoV-2.
Unanswered questions on the airborne transmission of COVID-19

Zhaolin Gu,Jie Han,Liyuan Zhang,Hongliang Wang,Xilian Luo,Xiangzhao Meng,Yue Zhang,Xinyi Niu,Yang Lan,Shaowei Wu,Junji Cao,Eric Lichtfouse

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01557-z

IF: 13.615

2023-01-07

Environmental Chemistry Letters

Abstract:Policies and measures to control pandemics are often failing. While biological factors controlling transmission are usually well explored, little is known about the environmental drivers of transmission and infection. For instance, respiratory droplets and aerosol particles are crucial vectors for the airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the causation agent of the coronavirus 2019 pandemic (COVID-19). Once expectorated, respiratory droplets interact with atmospheric particulates that influence the viability and transmission of the novel coronavirus, yet there is little knowledge on this process or its consequences on virus transmission and infection. Here we review the effects of atmospheric particulate properties, vortex zones, and air pollution on virus survivability and transmission. We found that particle size, chemical constituents, electrostatic charges, and the moisture content of airborne particles can have notable effects on virus transmission, with higher survival generally associated with larger particles, yet some viruses are better preserved on small particles. Some chemical constituents and surface-adsorbed chemical species may damage peptide bonds in viral proteins and impair virus stability. Electrostatic charges and water content of atmospheric particulates may affect the adherence of virion particles and possibly their viability. In addition, vortex zones and human thermal plumes are major environmental factors altering the aerodynamics of buoyant particles in air, which can strongly influence the transport of airborne particles and the transmission of associated viruses. Insights into these factors may provide explanations for the widely observed positive correlations between COVID-19 infection and mortality with air pollution, of which particulate matter is a common constituent that may have a central role in the airborne transmission of the novel coronavirus.

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental,chemistry, multidisciplinary
Airborne transmission of COVID‐19 virus in enclosed spaces: An overview of research methods

Xingwang Zhao,Sumei Liu,Yonggao Yin,Qingyan Chen,Tengfei (Tim) Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.13056

IF: 6.5539

2022-06-16

Indoor Air

Abstract:Since the outbreak of COVID‐19 in December 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV‐2) has spread worldwide. This study summarized the transmission mechanisms of COVID‐19 and their main influencing factors, such as airflow patterns, air temperature, relative humidity, and social distancing. The transmission characteristics in existing cases are providing more and more evidence that SARS CoV‐2 can be transmitted through the air. This investigation reviewed probabilistic and deterministic research methods, such as the Wells–Riley equation, the dose‐response model, the Monte‐Carlo model, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with the Eulerian method, CFD with the Lagrangian method, and the experimental approach, that have been used for studying the airborne transmission mechanism. The Wells–Riley equation and dose‐response model are typically used for the assessment of the average infection risk. Only in combination with the Eulerian method or the Lagrangian method can these two methods obtain the spatial distribution of airborne particles' concentration and infection risk. In contrast with the Eulerian and Lagrangian methods, the Monte‐Carlo model is suitable for studying the infection risk when the behavior of individuals is highly random. Although researchers tend to use numerical methods to study the airborne transmission mechanism of COVID‐19, an experimental approach could often provide stronger evidence to prove the possibility of airborne transmission than a simple numerical model. All in all, the reviewed methods are helpful in the study of the airborne transmission mechanism of COVID‐19 and epidemic prevention and control.

engineering, environmental,public, environmental & occupational health,construction & building technology
SARS-CoV-2 Aerosol Transmission and Detection

Maosheng Yao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eehl.2022.03.001

2022-01-01

Eco-Environment & Health

Abstract:Aerosol transmission has been officially recognized by the world health authority resulting from its overwhelming experimental and epidemiological evidences. Despite substantial progress, few additional actions were taken to prevent aerosol transmission, and many key scientific questions still await urgent investigations. The grand challenge, the effective control of aerosol transmission of COVID-19, remains unsolved. A better understanding of the viral shedding into the air has been developed, but its temporal pattern is largely unknown. Sampling tools, as one of the critical elements for studying SARS-CoV-2 aerosol, are not readily available around the world. Many of them are less capable of preserving the viability of SARS-CoV-2, thus offering no clues about viral aerosol infectivity. As evidenced, the viability of SARS-CoV-2 is also directly impacted by temperature, humidity, sunlight, and air pollutants. For SARS-CoV-2 aerosol detection, liquid samplers, together with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), are currently used in certain enclosed or semi-enclosed environments. Sensitive and rapid COVID-19 screening technologies are in great need. Among others, the breath-borne-based method emerges with global attention due to its advantages in sample collection and early disease detection. To collectively confront these challenges, scientists from different fields around the world need to fight together for the welfare of mankind. This review summarized the current understanding of the aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and identified the key knowledge gaps with a to-do list. This review also serves as a call for efforts to develop technologies to better protect the people in a forthcoming reopening world.
Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in indoor environments: A comprehensive review

Jialei Shen,Meng Kong,Bing Dong,Michael J. Birnkrant,Jianshun Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2021.1977693

2021-09-22

Science and Technology for the Built Environment

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic has caused millions of deaths and great economic loss globally. There has been substantial evidence supporting the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Airborne route has been considered as a major transmission pathway, which can spread the disease over a longer distance and time. The viral loads in the respiratory tract of a virus carrier are typically below 109 RNA copies/mL and are related to the emission rate of pathogens. Most particles expelled during respiratory activities are smaller than 1–2 µm in diameter. Viral aerosols can remain infectious for hours under typical indoor conditions. Sunlight contributes greatly to the viability inactivation of SARS-CoV-2. The outbreaks in different scenarios are reviewed based on existing data. Most outbreaks were related to long-term care facilities, K-12 schools, restaurants, retail facilities, and offices. The Wells-Riley model for estimating the risk of airborne transmission is introduced, along with model parameters such as the quanta generation rate, virus-containing particle size distribution, and inactivation rate. The effectiveness of various IAQ control strategies for mitigating the airborne transmission risk is analyzed, including PPE, ventilation strategies, partitions, air cleaning, and disinfection technologies, and occupancy control strategies. Both benefits and costs should be considered in designing the control strategies.

engineering, mechanical,thermodynamics,construction & building technology
Aerodynamic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in two Wuhan hospitals

Yuan Liu,Zhi Ning,Yu Chen,Ming Guo,Yingle Liu,Nirmal Kumar Gali,Li Sun,Yusen Duan,Jing Cai,Dane Westerdahl,Xinjin Liu,Ke Xu,Kin-fai Ho,Haidong Kan,Qingyan Fu,Ke Lan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2271-3

IF: 64.8

2020-04-27

Nature

Abstract:The ongoing COVID-19 outbreak has spread rapidly on a global scale. While the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 via human respiratory droplets and direct contact is clear, the potential for aerosol transmission is poorly understood<sup>1–3</sup>. This study investigated the aerodynamic nature of SARS-CoV-2 by measuring viral RNA in aerosols in different areas of two Wuhan hospitals during the COVID-19 outbreak in February and March 2020. The concentration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in aerosols detected in isolation wards and ventilated patient rooms was very low, but it was elevated in the patients' toilet areas. Levels of airborne SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the majority of public areas was undetectable except in two areas prone to crowding, possibly due to infected carriers in the crowd. We found that some medical staff areas initially had high concentrations of viral RNA with aerosol size distributions showing peaks in submicrometre and/or supermicrometre regions, but these levels were reduced to undetectable levels after implementation of rigorous sanitization procedures. Although we have not established the infectivity of the virus detected in these hospital areas, we propose that SARS-CoV-2 may have the potential to be transmitted via aerosols. Our results indicate that room ventilation, open space, sanitization of protective apparel, and proper use and disinfection of toilet areas can effectively limit the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in aerosols. Future work should explore the infectivity of aerosolized virus.

multidisciplinary sciences
Mitigating airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2

Sarah Addleman,Victor Leung,Leyla Asadi,Abdu Sharkawy,Jennifer McDonald

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.210830

2021-06-08

Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract:KEY POINTSAt the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, understanding of respiratory virus transmission was founded on a conceptual framework that dichotomized infectious particles into droplets that are > 5 μm and "drop" close to the source, versus aerosols that are < 5 μm and remain suspended in

medicine, general & internal
Prediction and control of aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in ventilated context: from source to receptor

Chunwen Xu,Wenbing Liu,Xilian Luo,Xingyu Huang,Peter V Nielsen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103416

Abstract:Global spread of COVID-19 has seriously threatened human life and health. The aerosol transmission route of SARS-CoV-2 is observed often associated with infection clusters under poorly ventilated environment. In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, significant transformation and optimization of traditional ventilation systems are needed. This paper is aimed to offer better understanding and insights into effective ventilation design to maximize its ability in airborne risk control, for particularly the COVID-19. Comprehensive reviews of each phase of aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from source to receptor are conducted, so as to provide a theoretical basis for risk prediction and control. Infection risk models and their key parameters for risk assessment of SARS-CoV-2 are analyzed. Special focus is given on the efficacy of different ventilation strategies in mitigating airborne transmission. Ventilation interventions are found mainly impacting on the dispersion and inhalation phases of aerosol transmission. The airflow patterns become a key factor in controlling the aerosol diffusion and distribution. Novel and personalized ventilation design, effective integration with other environmental control techniques and resilient HVAC system design to adapt both common and epidemic conditions are still remaining challenging, which need to be solved with the aid of multidisciplinary research and intelligent technologies.
Echoes Through Time: the Historical Origins of the Droplet Dogma and Its Role in the Misidentification of Airborne Respiratory Infection Transmission

Jose Jimenez,Linsey Marr,Katherine Randall,E. Thomas Ewing,Zeynep Tufekci,Trish Greenhalgh,Donald K. Milton,Raymond Tellier,Julian Tang,Yuguo Li,Lidia Morawska,Jonathan Mesiano-Crookston,David Fisman,Orla Hegarty,Stephanie Dancer,Philomena Bluyssen,Giorgio Buonanno,Marcel Loomans,William Bahnfleth,Maosheng Yao,Chandra Sekhar,Pawel Wargocki,Arsen Krikor Melikov,Kimberly Prather

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3904176

2021-01-01

Abstract:The question of whether SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted by droplets or aerosols has been very controversial. We sought to explain this controversy through a historical analysis of transmission research in other diseases. For most of human history, many diseases were thought to transmit through the air, often over long distances and in a phantasmagorical way, and often in error (e.g. malaria, cholera). Building on the germ theory of disease developed in the mid 19th century and on the demise of miasma theory, prominent public health official Charles Chapin in 1910 urged the public health community to focus on contact and droplet infection. However, he introduced a major error in the process: that ease of infection in close proximity is associated exclusively with large “sprayborne” droplets that fall to the ground quickly, and he deemed airborne transmission as very unlikely. This new paradigm became dominant, leading to systematic errors in the interpretation of research evidence on transmission. For the next five decades, no disease was accepted by the general medical and infection control communities as airborne, until tuberculosis (which had been misclassified as droplet) in 1962. Chapin’s paradigm remained dominant and only a few diseases were widely accepted as transmitted by aerosols before COVID-19: those that were clearly transmitted over long distances or time scales. Resistance to the idea of airborne spread of a respiratory infection is not new. In fact, it has occurred repeatedly over much of the last century and greatly hampered understanding of how diseases transmit.
Long distance airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: rapid systematic review

Daphne Duval,Jennifer C Palmer,Isobel Tudge,Nicola Pearce-Smith,Emer O'Connell,Allan Bennett,Rachel Clark,Emer O’Connell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068743

2022-06-29

BMJ

Abstract:Abstract Objectives To evaluate the potential for long distance airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in indoor community settings and to investigate factors that might influence transmission. Design Rapid systematic review and narrative synthesis. Data sources Medline, Embase, medRxiv, Arxiv, and WHO COVID-19 Research Database for studies published from 27 July 2020 to 19 January 2022; existing relevant rapid systematic review for studies published from 1 January 2020 to 27 July 2020; and citation analysis in Web of Science and Cocites. Eligibility criteria for study selection Observational studies reporting on transmission events in indoor community (non-healthcare) settings in which long distance airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was the most likely route. Studies such as those of household transmission where the main transmission route was likely to be close contact or fomite transmission were excluded. Data extraction and synthesis Data extraction was done by one reviewer and independently checked by a second reviewer. Primary outcomes were SARS-CoV-2 infections through long distance airborne transmission (>2 m) and any modifying factors. Methodological quality of included studies was rated using the quality criteria checklist, and certainty of primary outcomes was determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Narrative synthesis was themed by setting. Results 22 reports relating to 18 studies were identified (methodological quality was high in three, medium in five, and low in 10); all the studies were outbreak investigations. Long distance airborne transmission was likely to have occurred for some or all transmission events in 16 studies and was unclear in two studies (GRADE: very low certainty). In the 16 studies, one or more factors plausibly increased the likelihood of long distance airborne transmission, particularly insufficient air replacement (very low certainty), directional air flow (very low certainty), and activities associated with increased emission of aerosols, such as singing or speaking loudly (very low certainty). In 13 studies, the primary cases were reported as being asymptomatic, presymptomatic, or around symptom onset at the time of transmission. Although some of the included studies were well conducted outbreak investigations, they remain at risk of bias owing to study design and do not always provide the level of detail needed to fully assess transmission routes. Conclusion This rapid systematic review found evidence suggesting that long distance airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 might occur in indoor settings such as restaurants, workplaces, and venues for choirs, and identified factors such as insufficient air replacement that probably contributed to transmission. These results strengthen the need for mitigation measures in indoor settings, particularly the use of adequate ventilation. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42021236762.

medicine, general & internal
Environmental impacts on the transmission and evolution of COVID-19 combing the knowledge of pathogenic respiratory coronaviruses

Jing Zhan,Qian S. Liu,Zhendong Sun,Qunfang Zhou,Ligang Hu,Guangbo Qu,Jianqing Zhang,Bin Zhao,Guibin Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115621

IF: 8.9

2020-12-01

Environmental Pollution

Abstract:The emergence of a novel coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 during December 2019, has caused the global outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is officially announced to be a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). The increasing burden from this pandemic is seriously affecting everyone's life, and threating the global public health. Understanding the transmission, survival, and evolution of the virus in the environment will assist in the prevention, control, treatment, and eradication of its infection. Herein, we aimed to elucidate the environmental impacts on the transmission and evolution of SARS-CoV-2, based on briefly introducing this respiratory virus. Future research objectives for the prevention and control of these contagious viruses and their related diseases are highlighted from the perspective of environmental science. This review should be of great help to prevent and control the epidemics caused by emerging respiratory coronaviruses (CoVs).

environmental sciences
Infectious Disease Transmission via Aerosol Propagation from a Molecular Communication Perspective: Shannon Meets Coronavirus

Max Schurwanz,Peter Adam Hoeher,Sunasheer Bhattacharjee,Martin Damrath,Lukas Stratmann,Falko Dressler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2000956

2021-02-03

Abstract:Molecular communication is not only able to mimic biological and chemical communication mechanisms, but also provides a theoretical framework for viral infection processes. In this tutorial, aerosol and droplet transmission is modeled as a multiuser scenario with mobile nodes, related to broadcasting and relaying. In contrast to data communication systems, in the application of pathogen-laden aerosol transmission, mutual information between nodes should be minimized. Towards this goal, several countermeasures are reasoned. The findings are supported by experimental results and by an advanced particle simulation tool. This work is inspired by the recent outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, but also applicable to other airborne infectious diseases like influenza.

Signal Processing,Other Quantitative Biology
What Were the Historical Reasons for the Resistance to Recognizing Airborne Transmission During the COVID‐19 Pandemic?

Jose L Jimenez,Linsey C Marr,Katherine Randall,Edward Thomas Ewing,Zeynep Tufekci,Trish Greenhalgh,Raymond Tellier,Julian W Tang,Yuguo Li,Lidia Morawska,Jonathan Mesiano-Crookston,David Fisman,Orla Hegarty,Stephanie J Dancer,Philomena M Bluyssen,Giorgio Buonanno,Marcel G L C Loomans,William P Bahnfleth,Maosheng Yao,Chandra Sekhar,Pawel Wargocki,Arsen K Melikov,Kimberly A Prather

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.13070

IF: 6.5539

2022-01-01

Indoor Air

Abstract:The question of whether SARS-CoV-2 is mainly transmitted by droplets or aerosols has been highly controversial. We sought to explain this controversy through a historical analysis of transmission research in other diseases. For most of human history, the dominant paradigm was that many diseases were carried by the air, often over long distances and in a phantasmagorical way. This miasmatic paradigm was challenged in the mid to late 19th century with the rise of germ theory, and as diseases such as cholera, puerperal fever, and malaria were found to actually transmit in other ways. Motivated by his views on the importance of contact/droplet infection, and the resistance he encountered from the remaining influence of miasma theory, prominent public health official Charles Chapin in 1910 helped initiate a successful paradigm shift, deeming airborne transmission most unlikely. This new paradigm became dominant. However, the lack of understanding of aerosols led to systematic errors in the interpretation of research evidence on transmission pathways. For the next five decades, airborne transmission was considered of negligible or minor importance for all major respiratory diseases, until a demonstration of airborne transmission of tuberculosis (which had been mistakenly thought to be transmitted by droplets) in 1962. The contact/droplet paradigm remained dominant, and only a few diseases were widely accepted as airborne before COVID-19: those that were clearly transmitted to people not in the same room. The acceleration of interdisciplinary research inspired by the COVID-19 pandemic has shown that airborne transmission is a major mode of transmission for this disease, and is likely to be significant for many respiratory infectious diseases.
Superspreading events suggest aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by accumulation in enclosed spaces

John M. Kolinski,Tobias M. Schneider

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.033109

IF: 2.707

2021-03-23

Physical Review E

Abstract:Viral transmission pathways have profound implications for public safety; it is thus imperative to establish a complete understanding of viable infectious avenues. Mounting evidence suggests SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted via the air; however, this has not yet been demonstrated. Here we quantitatively analyze virion accumulation by accounting for aerosolized virion emission and destabilization. Reported superspreading events analyzed within this framework point towards aerosol mediated transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Virion exposure calculated for these events is found to trace out a single value, suggesting a universal minimum infective dose (MID) via aerosol that is comparable to the MIDs measured for other respiratory viruses; thus, the consistent infectious exposure levels and their commensurability to known aerosol-MIDs establishes the plausibility of aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Using filtration at a rate exceeding the destabilization rate of aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 can reduce exposure below this infective dose. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.033109 ©2021 American Physical Society

physics, fluids & plasmas, mathematical
Superspreading and heterogeneity in transmission of SARS, MERS, and COVID-19: A systematic review

Jingxuan Wang,Xiao Chen,Zihao Guo,Shi Zhao,Ziyue Huang,Zian Zhuang,Eliza Lai-yi Wong,Benny Chung-Ying Zee,Marc Ka Chun Chong,Maggie Haitian Wang,Eng Kiong Yeoh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.045

IF: 6.155

2021-01-01

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Abstract:Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have caused substantial public health burdens and global health threats. Understanding the superspreading potentials of these viruses are important for characterizing transmission patterns and informing strategic decision-making in disease control. This systematic review aimed to summarize the existing evidence on superspreading features and to compare the heterogeneity in transmission within and among various betacoronavirus epidemics of SARS, MERS and COVID-19. Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were extensively searched for original studies on the transmission heterogeneity of SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 published in English between January 1, 2003, and February 10, 2021. After screening the articles, we extracted data pertaining to the estimated dispersion parameter (k) which has been a commonly-used measurement for superspreading potential. Findings: We included a total of 60 estimates of transmission heterogeneity from 26 studies on outbreaks in 22 regions. The majority (90%) of the k estimates were small, with values less than 1, indicating an over-dispersed transmission pattern. The point estimates of k for SARS and MERS ranged from 0.12 to 0.20 and from 0.06 to 2.94, respectively. Among 45 estimates of individual-level transmission heterogeneity for COVID-19 from 17 articles, 91% were derived from Asian regions. The point estimates of k for COVID-19 ranged between 0.1 and 5.0. Conclusions: We detected a substantial over-dispersed transmission pattern in all three coronaviruses, while the k estimates varied by differences in study design and public health capacity. Our findings suggested that even with a reduced R value, the epidemic still has a high resurgence potential due to transmission heterogeneity. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology.
Transmission of COVID-19 virus by droplets and aerosols: A critical review on the unresolved dichotomy

Mahesh Jayaweera,Hasini Perera,Buddhika Gunawardana,Jagath Manatunge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109819

IF: 8.3

2020-09-01

Environmental Research

Abstract:The practice of social distancing and wearing masks has been popular worldwide in combating the contraction of COVID-19. Undeniably, although such practices help control the COVID-19 pandemic to a greater extent, the complete control of virus-laden droplet and aerosol transmission by such practices is poorly understood. This review paper intends to outline the literature concerning the transmission of virus-laden droplets and aerosols in different environmental settings and demonstrates the behavior of droplets and aerosols resulted from a cough-jet of an infected person in various confined spaces. The case studies that have come out in different countries have, with prima facie evidence, manifested that the airborne transmission plays a profound role in contracting susceptible hosts. The infection propensities in confined spaces (airplane, passenger car, and healthcare center) by the transmission of droplets and aerosols under varying ventilation conditions were discussed.Interestingly, the nosocomial transmission by airborne SARS-CoV-2 virus-laden aerosols in healthcare facilities may be plausible. Hence, clearly defined, science-based administrative, clinical, and physical measures are of paramount importance to eradicate the COVID-19 pandemic from the world.

environmental sciences,public, environmental & occupational health
Quantifying multi-virion aerosols in respiratory infection transmission

Pan Cheng,Wei Jia,Li Liu,Hui-Ling Yen,Yuguo Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136040

IF: 13.6

2024-10-05

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract:Infectious aerosols are expired in various sizes, and the number of contained virions is expected to significantly vary among expired aerosols. To evaluate the effect of the number of contained virions on infection risk, multi-virion aerosols in expired air should be first quantified. In this study, we categorised expired aerosols into traditional aerosol size bins and aerosols containing different number of virions. We quantified the number of virions in aerosols of each size bin and estimated the size distribution of aerosols which contain a certain number of virions when the viral load is known. This analysis helped us to determine the relationship between multi-size aerosols and multi-virion aerosols. Our findings indicate that for long-range airborne transmission, the airborne transmission droplets derived from four COVID-19 outbreak venues contain at most one infectious virion, supporting the one-virion assumption for the considered viral load ranges. However, for short-range airborne transmission, the impact of multi-virion aerosols on infection risk must be considered. Our quantification of multi-virion aerosols for the first time lays the groundwork for incorporating the multi-virion assumption into infection risk assessments.

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental

Transmission Via Aerosols: Plausible Differences among Emerging Coronaviruses

Transmission of Coronavirus via Aerosols and Influence of Environmental Conditions on Its Transmission

Aerosol Transmission of Coronavirus and Influenza Virus of Animal Origin

On Airborne Transmission and Control of SARS-Cov-2

Aerosol Transmission of SARS-CoV-2? Evidence, Prevention and Control

Unanswered questions on the airborne transmission of COVID-19

Airborne transmission of COVID‐19 virus in enclosed spaces: An overview of research methods

SARS-CoV-2 Aerosol Transmission and Detection

Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in indoor environments: A comprehensive review

Aerodynamic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in two Wuhan hospitals

Mitigating airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2

Prediction and control of aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in ventilated context: from source to receptor

Echoes Through Time: the Historical Origins of the Droplet Dogma and Its Role in the Misidentification of Airborne Respiratory Infection Transmission

Long distance airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: rapid systematic review

Environmental impacts on the transmission and evolution of COVID-19 combing the knowledge of pathogenic respiratory coronaviruses

Infectious Disease Transmission via Aerosol Propagation from a Molecular Communication Perspective: Shannon Meets Coronavirus

What Were the Historical Reasons for the Resistance to Recognizing Airborne Transmission During the COVID‐19 Pandemic?

Superspreading events suggest aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by accumulation in enclosed spaces

Superspreading and heterogeneity in transmission of SARS, MERS, and COVID-19: A systematic review

Transmission of COVID-19 virus by droplets and aerosols: A critical review on the unresolved dichotomy

Quantifying multi-virion aerosols in respiratory infection transmission