Abstract:Objective: Invasive lung adenocarcinoma is composed of five different histological subgroups with diverse biological behavior and heterogeneous morphology, the acinar/papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinomas are the most common subgroups and recognized as an intermediate-grade group. In the real world, clinicians primarily consider predominant patterns and ignore the impact of minor components in the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma. The study evaluated the clinicopathologic characteristics of the lepidic, solid, and micropapillary patterns as non-predominant components and whether the minimal patterns had prognostic value on acinar/papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinomas. Methods: A total of 153 acinar/papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size ≤4 cm were classified into four risk subgroups based on the presence of lepidic and micropapillary/solid components: MP/S − Lep + , MP/S + Lep + , MP/S − Lep − , and MP/S + Lep − groups. The Cox-proportional hazard regression model was used to assess disease-free survival (DFS). Results: The risk subgroups based on the non-predominant patterns were associated with differentiation ( P = 0.001), lymphovascular invasion ( P = 0.001), and recurrence ( P = 0.003). In univariate analysis, DFS was correlated with non-predominant components ( P = 0.014), lymphovascular invasion ( P = 0.001), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ( P = 0.001), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ( P = 0.012). In the multivariate analysis, non-predominant components ( P = 0.043) and PLR ( P = 0.032) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. The 5-year survival rates of MP/S − Lep + , MP/S + Lep + , MP/S − Lep − and MP/S + Lep − subgroups were 93.1%,92.9%,73.1%,61.9%, respectively. The MP/S − Lep + subgroup had the favorable prognosis than MP/S + Lep − subgroup with a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.002). As minor components, the lepidic patterns were a protective factor, and the solid and micropapillary components were poor factors. The recurrence was related to the presence of non-predominant patterns rather than their proportion. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve the prognosis of the MP/S + Lep - subgroup ( P = 0.839). Conclusions: Regardless of the proportion, the presence of micropapillary/solid components and the absence of lepidic patterns are aggressive factors of DFS in patients with resected stage I acinar- or papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinoma.

The presence of micropapillary and/or solid subtypes is an independent prognostic factor for patients undergoing curative resection for stage I lung adenocarcinoma with ground-glass opacity

Micropapillary or solid component predicts worse prognosis in pathological IA stage lung adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis

Procedure-specific Prognostic Impact of Micropapillary Subtype May Guide Resection Strategy in Small-Sized Lung Adenocarcinomas: a Multicenter Study

Distinct Prognostic Factors in Patients with Stage I Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer with Radiologic Part-Solid or Solid Lesions

A Comprehensive Investigation of Molecular Features and Prognosis of Lung Adenocarcinoma with Micropapillary Component.

Minor Components of Micropapillary and Solid Subtypes in Lung Adenocarcinoma Are Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Poor Prognosis

Presence of Micropapillary and Solid Patterns Are Associated with Nodal Upstaging and Unfavorable Prognosis among Patient with Ct1n0m0 Lung Adenocarcinoma: a Large-Scale Analysis

The Prognostic and Predictive Value of Solid Subtype in Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma

Minor histological components predict the recurrence of patients with resected stage I acinar- or papillary-predominant lung adenocarcinoma

Prognostic impact of micropapillary component in patients with node‐negative subcentimeter lung adenocarcinoma: A Chinese cohort study

Prognostic Effect of Ground-Glass Opacity in Subcentimeter Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma

[Analysis of the Effect of Different Pathological Subtypes to Prognosis in Stage I Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma].

Comprehensive Investigation of Mutational Features of Various Lung Adenocarcinoma Histological Subtypes among Chinese Patients.

Lung Adenocarcinomas Manifesting As Radiological Part-Solid Nodules Define a Special Clinical Subtype.

Prognostic Factors in Curatively Resected Pathological Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma

Histopathologic Pattern and Molecular Risk Stratification Are Associated with Prognosis in Patients with Stage IB Lung Adenocarcinoma

Micropapillary and Solid Histologic Patterns in N1 and N2 Lymph Node Metastases Are Independent Factors of Poor Prognosis in Patients with Stages II to III Lung Adenocarcinoma.

[Clinicopathological Characteristics and Imaging Features of Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma with Micropapillary Pattern].

Correlation of Survival and EGFR Mutation with Predominant Histologic Subtype According to the New Lung Adenocarcinoma Classification in Stage IB Patients

Correlation in histological subtypes with high resolution computed tomography signatures of early stage lung adenocarcinoma.

A Multi-institutional Analysis of the Combined Effect of Micropapillary Component and Consolidation-to-Tumor Ratio >0.5 on the Prognosis of Pathological, Stage IA3, Lung Adenocarcinoma