Abstract:The reverse transcription reaction which transcribes mRNA into cDNA is catalyzed by an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase named reverse transcriptase (RT). This enzyme is involved in the infectious cycle of retroviruses and promotes RNA recombination by the strand transfer (also called strand switch) mechanism to expand the genetic variability of viruses. Research shows that the occurrence of strand transfer depends upon both activities carried by RT, that is, its RNase H and polymerase activities. Before switching templates, RNase activity is required for the removal of RNA fragments annealed to the nascent DNA strand, which makes the 3′ end of this DNA available for hybridization to the homologous region of another template RNA [1]. In vitro experiments also suggest that homologous recombination between two distinct RNA templates promoted by RT needs the involvement of RNase H activity [2, 3]. For example, Negroni et al. [3] found RNase H+ RT may produce low recombination frequency (1.4×10−3) from two distinct RNA templates, but RT lacking RNase H activity (RNase H− RT) cannot recombine two RNA molecules. Moreover, to our knowledge, no one has reported that RNase H− RT has the capability of switching templates during reverse transcription. Regarding the argument proposed by Zeng and Wang, the question is whether BmTXKβ–BmKCT is an artifact or a naturally occurring transcript. First we must emphasize that the RT we used in the synthesis of the first strand cDNA is an engineered MMLV-RT provided by Gibco BRL (Superscript RT). This enzyme does not contain RNase H activity. Therefore, this excludes the possibility of template switching. Considering the fact that Zeng and Wang used the same RT as we did for the synthesis of the first strand cDNA, we do not know how they detected a 1% recombination rate in their experiment. And in fact, even with RNase H+ RT, template switching in vitro is a low frequency event because the nascent DNA must bind to the free homologous region of the second RNA template. In other words, the acceptor RNA must remain uncomplexed to its cDNA during template switching [3]. Obviously, this scenario should be very rare in an in vitro system. Lastly, the only paper cited by Zeng and Wang for criticizing our work actually does not support their results. Perhaps they neglected the basic conclusion made by [5], which is that RNase H+ AMV-RT only forms fusion products at 37°C for much longer incubation times (90 min) [5]. In fact, both Zeng and Wang and our laboratory used RNase H− MMLV-RT to perform the first strand reaction at 37°C for 60 min [4]. In conclusion, regardless of whether one argues on the basis of reaction parameters or enzymology, BmTXKβ–BmKCT is a naturally occurring transcript, and not an artifact. We feel that Zeng and Wang's argument lacks support in theory and overemphasizes cloning errors derived from RT.

Does Mmlv-Rt Lacking Rnase H Activity Have the Capability of Switching Templates During Reverse Transcription?

Net-1 Frameshifting on A Noncanonical Sequence in A Herpes Simplex Virus Drug-Resistant Mutant is Stimulated by Nonstop Mrna

Template-switching mechanism of a group II intron-encoded reverse transcriptase and its implications for biological function and RNA-Seq

Structural basis for template switching by a group II intron-encoded non-LTR-retroelement reverse transcriptase

Charge Engineering of the Nucleic Acid Binding Cleft of a Thermostable HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Reveals Key Interactions and a Novel Mechanism of RNase H Inactivation

High-Frequency Illegitimate Strand Transfers Of Nascent Dna Fragments During Reverse Transcription Result In Defective Retrovirus Genomes

Small Rna Existed in Commercial Reverse Transcriptase: Primary Evidence of Functional Small Rnas

Invitro Cleavage of Hpv16 E6 and E7 Rna Fragments by Synthetic Ribozymes and Transcribed Ribozymes from Rna-Trimming Plasmids

Studies on the Reverse Transcription Activity of Taq DNAI Polymerase

Distinct and overlapping RNA determinants for binding and target-primed reverse transcription by Bombyx mori R2 retrotransposon protein

Single-Molecule Study of Dna Polymerization Activity of Hiv-1 Reverse Transcriptase on Dna Templates

Effect of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (Hiv-1) Nucleocapsid Protein on Hiv-1 Reverse Transcriptase Activity in Vitro

RdRp or RT, That is the Question

APOBEC3 Host Restriction Factors of HIV-1 Can Change the Template Switching Frequency of Reverse Transcriptase

Structural basis of suppression of host translation termination by Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus

Reverse transcription of plasma-derived HIV-1 RNA generates multiple artifacts through tRNA(Lys-3)-priming

HIV-1 nucleocapsid traps reverse transcriptase on nucleic acid substrates

Novel RNase H Inhibitors Blocking RNA-directed Strand Displacement DNA Synthesis by HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase.

Heterologous RNA Replication Enhancer Stimulates in Vitro RNA Synthesis and Template-Switching by the Carmovirus, but Not by the Tombusvirus, RNA-dependent RNA Polymerase: Implication for Modular Evolution of RNA Viruses.

Amplification of Full Jength Mrna 5'ends Based on Template-switching Effects

Enhanced detection of RNA by MMLV reverse transcriptase coupled with thermostable DNA polymerase and DNA/RNA helicase