Abstract:The reverse transcription reaction which transcribes mRNA into cDNA is catalyzed by an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase named reverse transcriptase (RT). This enzyme is involved in the infectious cycle of retroviruses and promotes RNA recombination by the strand transfer (also called strand switch) mechanism to expand the genetic variability of viruses. Research shows that the occurrence of strand transfer depends upon both activities carried by RT, that is, its RNase H and polymerase activities. Before switching templates, RNase activity is required for the removal of RNA fragments annealed to the nascent DNA strand, which makes the 3′ end of this DNA available for hybridization to the homologous region of another template RNA [1]. In vitro experiments also suggest that homologous recombination between two distinct RNA templates promoted by RT needs the involvement of RNase H activity [2, 3]. For example, Negroni et al. [3] found RNase H+ RT may produce low recombination frequency (1.4×10−3) from two distinct RNA templates, but RT lacking RNase H activity (RNase H− RT) cannot recombine two RNA molecules. Moreover, to our knowledge, no one has reported that RNase H− RT has the capability of switching templates during reverse transcription. Regarding the argument proposed by Zeng and Wang, the question is whether BmTXKβ–BmKCT is an artifact or a naturally occurring transcript. First we must emphasize that the RT we used in the synthesis of the first strand cDNA is an engineered MMLV-RT provided by Gibco BRL (Superscript RT). This enzyme does not contain RNase H activity. Therefore, this excludes the possibility of template switching. Considering the fact that Zeng and Wang used the same RT as we did for the synthesis of the first strand cDNA, we do not know how they detected a 1% recombination rate in their experiment. And in fact, even with RNase H+ RT, template switching in vitro is a low frequency event because the nascent DNA must bind to the free homologous region of the second RNA template. In other words, the acceptor RNA must remain uncomplexed to its cDNA during template switching [3]. Obviously, this scenario should be very rare in an in vitro system. Lastly, the only paper cited by Zeng and Wang for criticizing our work actually does not support their results. Perhaps they neglected the basic conclusion made by [5], which is that RNase H+ AMV-RT only forms fusion products at 37°C for much longer incubation times (90 min) [5]. In fact, both Zeng and Wang and our laboratory used RNase H− MMLV-RT to perform the first strand reaction at 37°C for 60 min [4]. In conclusion, regardless of whether one argues on the basis of reaction parameters or enzymology, BmTXKβ–BmKCT is a naturally occurring transcript, and not an artifact. We feel that Zeng and Wang's argument lacks support in theory and overemphasizes cloning errors derived from RT.

Distinct and overlapping RNA determinants for binding and target-primed reverse transcription by Bombyx mori R2 retrotransposon protein

Structure of the R2 non-LTR retrotransposon initiating target-primed reverse transcription

Chromatin-interacting transposon RNAs linking to the core trans-inhibition circuitry for embryonic stem cell identity

Structural RNA Components Supervise the Sequential DNA Cleavage in R2 Retrotransposon

Conserved and divergent DNA recognition specificities and functions of R2 retrotransposon N-terminal domains

The Ribosomal Protein RpL22 Interacts In Vitro with 5′-UTR Sequences Found in Some Drosophila melanogaster Transposons

Structures of vertebrate R2 retrotransposon complexes during target-primed reverse transcription and after second strand nicking

Internal initiation of reverse transcription in a Penelope-like retrotransposon

Structure and sequence at an RNA template 5' end influence insertion of transgenes by an R2 retrotransposon protein

Structural basis for template switching by a group II intron-encoded non-LTR-retroelement reverse transcriptase

Structural Requirements for Reverse Transcription by a Diversity-generating Retroelement

Diverse roles of host RNA binding proteins in RNA virus replication.

LTR-mediated Retroposition As a Mechanism of RNA-based Duplication in Metazoans

Transposable-Element Associated Small Rnas in Bombyx Mori Genome

Distinct and overlapping roles for two Dicer-like proteins in the RNA interference pathways of the ancient eukaryote Trypanosoma brucei

RdRp or RT, That is the Question

RIP-seq of BmAgo2-associated small RNAs reveal various types of small non-coding RNAs in the silkworm, Bombyx mori

Template-switching mechanism of a group II intron-encoded reverse transcriptase and its implications for biological function and RNA-Seq

Genetic Identification of Potential RNA-binding Regions in a Group II Intron-Encoded Reverse Transcriptase

Evolutionary origins of archaeal and eukaryotic RNA-guided RNA modification in bacterial IS110 transposons

Does Mmlv-Rt Lacking Rnase H Activity Have the Capability of Switching Templates During Reverse Transcription?