Abstract:CIE has recently recommended a new color appearance model CIECAM16 to replace CIECAM02. It was also intended to recommend a uniform color space (UCS) based on CIECAM16, CIECAM16-UCS, for predicting color difference. However, there was a debate as to whether CIECAM16 can be used to predict color difference, since it takes tristimulus values calculated using the CIE 2 degrees observer as input, while tristimulus values for color difference are usually calculated using the CIE 10 degrees observer, as in the CIEDE2000 formula. Thus, further evidence is needed before CAM16-UCS can be recommended by the CIE as uniform color space. In this paper, we investigate the likely difference in color difference prediction when using CAM16-UCS, and its potential statistical significance. Firstly, the reflectance of each pair of color samples in the visual color difference datasets: BFD-P, Leeds, RIT-DuPont and Witt was generated based on the given tristimulus values. Then, color difference AE2,F and AE10,F, with F being the CAM16-UCS, can be computed under any illuminant using the 2 degrees and 10 degrees observers respectively. Comparison results showed that the difference between AE2,F and AE10,F was not statistically significant. Finally, both AE2,F and AE10,F were used to predict the visual color difference DV and the STRESS values between AE2,F and DV, and between AE10,F and DV respectively. Statistical tests showed that the differences between AE2,F and DV, and between AE10,F and DV were not significant. Hence this study shows that CAM16-UCS can be reliably used for predicting color difference. The findings are valuable for CIE to recommend CAM16-UCS as a uniform color space. Currently CIE TC1-98 is investigating the establishment of a new colorimetric system based on cone response tristimulus values LMS. It is expected that the reflectance datasets generated from the color difference datasets will be useful for the evaluation of any new colorimetric system.(c) 2023 Society for Imaging Science and Technology.

Test Criteria and Investigation of Uniform Color Spaces to Meet the Requirements of Future Imagery

Investigating Performance of Uniform Color Spaces for High Dynamic Range and Wide Gamut Color Difference Applications

Hue Linearity of Color Spaces for Wide Color Gamut and High Dynamic Range Media.

Perceptually Uniform Color Space for Image Signals Including High Dynamic Range and Wide Gamut.

Testing Uniform Colour Spaces Using Colour Differences of a Wide Colour Gamut

Uniform Colour Spaces Based on CIECAM02 Colour Appearance Model

Color Difference Evaluation for Wide-Color-gamut Displays.

Evaluation Of Colour Fidelity Based Colour Rendering Indices

Comprehensive color solutions: CAM16, CAT16, and CAM16-UCS

Color volumes in lab and ICtCp color spaces for viewing angle color characterization of QLED and OLED HDR/WCG displays

New Uniform Colour Spaces

Image Quality Assessment and Color Difference

Testing Colour Appearance Model Based UCS Using HDR, WCG and COMBVD Datasets

Uniform Color Space for Color Storage

The Analysis of Colour Uniformity for a Volumetric Display Based on a Rotating LED Array

Testing Uniform Colour Spaces Using Printed Samples.

Performance Evaluation of JPEG, JPEG2000 and New CSI-JPEG Algorithms by Incorporating Different Color Spaces

44.2: An analysis of image uniformity of three-dimensional image based on rotating LED array volumetric display system

A Comprehensive Test of Colour‐difference Formulae and Uniform Colour Spaces Using Available Visual Datasets

Evaluation of Gamut Mapping Algorithms in different Uniform Colour Spaces

Evaluation of Color Difference Prediction with CIECAM16 Using CIE 2-and 10-Degree Observers