Prognostic Value of Prerevascularization Fractional Flow Reserve Mediated by the Postrevascularization Level

Rikuta Hamaya,Murray A. Mittleman,Masahiro Hoshino,Yoshihisa Kanaji,Tadashi Murai,Joo Myung Lee,Ki Hong Choi,Jun-Jie Zhang,Fei Ye,Xiaobo Li,Zhen Ge,Shao-Liang Chen,Tsunekazu Kakuta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18162

2020-01-01

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:Question To what extent is the association of pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) with clinical outcomes explained by the association of pre-PCI FFR with post-PCI FFR? Findings In this cohort study of 1488 patients, low pre-PCI FFR was significantly associated with target vessel failure but not mediated by post-PCI FFR. Meaning The results of this study suggest that the prognostic information of pre-PCI FFR may not be associated with the results of PCI, represented as post-PCI FFR, indicating that the prognostic information of pre-PCI FFR may mainly reflect the global atherosclerotic burden of the artery, not the extent of the modifiable epicardial stenosis. Importance The prognostic value of pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) may be associated with the post-PCI FFR and their interaction. To correctly interpret the prognostic value of pre-PCI FFR, it is essential to understand to what extent the association of pre-PCI FFR with clinical outcomes is explained by post-PCI FFR. Objective To investigate the extent to which post-PCI FFR mediates the association of pre-PCI FFR with vessel-related outcomes using an international, multicenter collaboration registry. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used pooled patient data from 4 international FFR registries. A total of 1488 patients with pre-PCI FFR of 0.80 or less who underwent elective PCI were included. Data collection was conducted from November 2011 to August 2019, and analysis was conducted from September 2019 to July 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) during 2 years of follow-up. The extent to which post-PCI FFR of less than 0.90 mediated the association of pre-PCI FFR less than 0.75 (vs pre-PCI FFR of 0.75 or greater) with TVF was evaluated using a mediation analysis in a counterfactual framework. Results Among 1488 patients, the mean (SD) age was 63.5 (9.9) years and 1161 patients (78.0%) were men. The median (interquartile range) pre-PCI and post-PCI FFR were 0.71 (0.62-0.76) and 0.88 (0.83-0.92), respectively. The direct association of low pre-PCI FFR (ie, <0.75) with TVF was significant (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.03-3.17; P = .04), while the mediation by post-PCI FFR level of less than 0.90 was not (indirect association: odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.98-1.09; P = .24). In sensitivity analyses using several pre-PCI cutoffs, the mediations by post-PCI FFR were consistently weak. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, the association of pre-PCI FFR with TVF was not significantly mediated by post-PCI FFR. Poor prognosis due to progressed atherosclerosis, represented as low FFR, may not be reversed by successful PCI that increases FFR. Therefore, the prognostic value of pre-PCI FFR may mainly reflect the global atherosclerotic burden, not the extent of the modifiable epicardial stenosis. This cohort study investigates the extent to which post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) mediates the association of pre-PCI FFR with vessel-related outcomes using an international, multicenter collaboration registry.