Abstract:Abstract Background Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the current standard for determining severity of epicardial stenosis and indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However in practice, FFR is not enough robust to select lesions that will truly benefit from PCI. Coronary flow capacity (CFC) provides integrated information of coronary flow reserve (CFR) and coronary flow during hyperemia that is useful for identifying flow-limiting stenosis considering both epicardial and microvascular conditions. Objective We hypothesized that the effect of FFR-guided PCI would be enhanced by further consideration of CFC. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic effect of PCI according to CFC status of the stable lesions, using pressure-temperature sensor-tipped wire for FFR and CFC evaluation. Methods From a global, multicenter registry of comprehensive physiological assessment, a total of 1397 patients (1694 vessels) were enrolled. Three patients/vessels were excluded due to lost follow-up. Low CFC was defined for lesions with reduced CFR and the corresponding inverse of thermodilution-derived mean transit time under hyperemia, which represents hyperemic coronary flow. The effect of FFR-guided PCI on vessel-oriented composite outcomes (VOCO) was assessed by multivariate marginal COX proportional regression model with or without the interaction term between PCI and CFC, using the CFC definition with the CFR threshold of 2.0 (Figure: red + green area showing low CFC). Using the same model, variously defined CFC was tested to determine the optimal thresholds (Figure: red only area ∼ red + green + blue area). Results During the 5-year follow-up period, VOCO was identified for a total of 113 vessels. In the multivariate model, the HR of PCI was 0.963 (95% CI: 0.538–1.723). When the interaction was added to the model, the effect of PCI on VOCO incidence was significantly different according to CFC status (p=0.069 for interaction). The optimal criterion of CFC was made where Akaike Information Criterion of the model was minimized (CFR threshold of 2.9 for the CFC definition), where PCI had HR of 0.443 (95% CI: 0.196–0.999) and 1.521 (95% CI: 0.828–2.796) for lesions low and high CFC, respectively. CFR had no significant interaction with PCI (p=0.26). CFC Map Conclusion The effect of PCI on VOCO was significantly different according to CFC status. PCI to lesions with low CFC was prognostically beneficial. Our results suggested the potential of CFC for optimizing PCI benefit in stable lesions after FFR assessment.

P4159Coronary flow capacity guidance optimizes the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable lesions: international registry of comprehensive physiologic evaluation