Minimum pupil in pupillary response to light and myopia affect disk halo size: a cross-sectional study.
Feng Zhao,Tian Han,Xun Chen,Zhi Chen,Ke Zheng,Xiaoying Wang,Xingtao Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019914
IF: 3.006
2018-01-01
BMJ Open
Abstract:Objectives To evaluate the relationship between pupillary response to light, myopia and disk halo size. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Single refractive surgery centre. Participants In this study, 197 right eyes of 197 patients between 20 and 35 years of age were evaluated for disk halo size and pupillary response to light with a vision monitor. Primary and secondary outcome measures Halo radius, age, spherical equivalent (SE), axial length (AL), initial diameter, amplitude of contraction, latency of contraction, duration of contraction, velocity of contraction, latency of dilation, duration of dilation, velocity of dilation, maximum pupil, minimum pupil, average pupil and dark pupil. Results Significant associations were found between disk halo size and SE (r=-0.219, P=0.002), AL (r=0.152, P=0.033) and minimum pupil (r=0.149, P=0.037). There were no associations between disk halo size and initial diameter, amplitude of contraction, latency of contraction, duration of contraction, velocity of contraction, latency of dilation, duration of dilation, velocity of dilation, maximum pupil, average pupil, dark pupil and age (P>0.05). A significant difference in disk halo size was detected between the low-moderate and high myopia (SE< -6 D) groups (P=0.002) and between the small and large (minimum pupil >= 4 mm) minimum pupil size groups (P=0.014). Conclusions Patients with a high SE and large minimum pupil size (minimum pupil >= 4 mm) suffered more disability glare than those with a low SE and small minimum pupil size.