Abstract:The binding of a series of hydroxamate inhibitors with gelatinase-A is examined to evaluate the viability of calculating free energies of binding, DeltaG(b), utilizing molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with a linear interaction energy approach. In our simulations, a bonded model was used to represent the potentials of the catalytic zinc center. The electrostatic distribution of this model was derived using a two-stage electrostatic potential fitting calculations. The resulting bonded model was then used to generate the MD trajectories. Coulombic, van der Waals, and coordinate bond energy components determined from MD simulations of the bound and unbound inhibitors solvated in water were correlated with the free energies of binding for the 15 hydroxamate inhibitors. In the correlation process, several linear models consisted of different energy components were tested. We found that besides the usually used Coulombic and van der Waals energy terms, the introduction of a constant term could significantly improve the correlation. The best model yields an average error of 0.6 kcal/mol for the 15 binding affinities, which cover an observed range of 7.2 kcal/mol. The predictive ability of the best model was revealed by the high value of q(2) (0.854) from the leave-one-out cross-validation. To this series of inhibitors, the constant term can be treated as effective adjustment to the entropy contribution in the binding free energies. The MD simulations predicted the binding mode of the gelatinase-A with the studied inhibitors, and also provided insights into the interactions occurring in the active site and the origins of variations in DeltaG(b) The P1 ' groups of inhibitors make extensive van der Waals and hydrophobic contacts with the nonpolar side chains of four residues in the S1 ' subsite, including Leu 197, Val 198, Leu 218, and Tyr 223, which directly influence the ligand binding. Hydrogen bonds between hydroxamates and gelatinase-A are very important to stabilize the inhibitors in the active site. The hydrogen bonds between the P-3' group and gelatinase-A can produce more favorable electrostatic interactions.

Prediction of binding free energies between benzamides and trypsin

The Prediction of Binding Free Energies for a Group of Trypsin Inhibitors

Predictions Of Binding Of A Diverse Set Of Ligands To Gelatinase-A By A Combination Of Molecular Dynamics And Continuum Solvent Models

Binding Affinities for A Series of Selective Inhibitors of Gelatinase-A Using Molecular Dynamics with A Linear Interaction Energy Approach

Non-bonded force field parameters from MBIS partitioning of the molecular electron density improve binding affinity predictions of the T4-lysozyme double mutant

Rapid and Reliable Binding Affinity Prediction of Bromodomain Inhibitors: A Computational Study

Binding free energy of protein/ligand complexes calculated using dissociation Parallel Cascade Selection Molecular Dynamics and Markov state model

Biomolecular conformational changes and ligand binding: from kinetics to thermodynamics.

Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA

Nonbonded Force Field Parameters from MBIS Partitioning of the Molecular Electron Density Improve Binding Affinity Predictions of the T4-Lysozyme Double Mutant

Binding Free Energy Calculations For Mmp2-Hydroxamate Complexes

Can molecular dynamics simulations improve predictions of protein-ligand binding affinity with machine learning?

Interpretation of the Binding Affinities of PTP1B Inhibitors with the MM-GB/SA Method and the X-score Scoring Function.

Predicted Par1 Inhibitors from Multiple Computational Methods

Accuracy and precision of binding free energy prediction for a tacrine related lead inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase with an arsenal of supercomputerized molecular modelling methods: a comparative study

Accurate Prediction for Protein-Peptide Binding Based on High-Temperature Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Binding Modes and Conformational Changes of FK506-binding Protein 51 Induced by Inhibitor Bindings: Insight into Molecular Mechanisms Based on Multiple Simulation Technologies

Assessing the Performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA Methods. 1. The Accuracy of Binding Free Energy Calculations Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Machine learning accelerates MD-based binding pose prediction between ligands and proteins

Rigorous Free Energy Perturbation Approach to Estimating Relative Binding Affinities Between Ligands with Multiple Protonation and Tautomeric States.

Binding Affinity of Hydroxamate Inhibitors of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2