Abstract:Accurate prediction of binding free energies is critical to streamlining the drug development and protein design process. With the advent of GPU acceleration, absolute alchemical methods, which simulate the removal of ligand electrostatics and van der Waals interactions with the protein, have become routinely accessible and provide a physically rigorous approach that enables full consideration of flexibility and solvent interaction. However, standard explicit solvent simulations are unable to model protonation or electronic polarization changes upon ligand transfer from water to the protein interior, leading to inaccurate prediction of binding affinities for charged molecules. Here, we perform extensive simulation totaling ∼540 μs to benchmark the impact of modeling conditions on predictive accuracy for absolute alchemical simulations. Binding to urokinase plasminogen activator (UPA), a protein frequently overexpressed in metastatic tumors, is evaluated for a set of 10 inhibitors with extended flexibility, highly charged character, and titratable properties. We demonstrate that the alchemical simulations can be adapted to utilize the MBAR/PBSA method to improve the accuracy upon incorporating electronic polarization, highlighting the importance of polarization in alchemical simulations of binding affinities. Comparison of binding energy prediction at various protonation states indicates that proper electrostatic setup is also crucial in binding affinity prediction of charged systems, prompting us to propose an alternative binding mode with protonated ligand phenol and Hid-46 at the binding site, a testable hypothesis for future experimental validation.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01305?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01305</a>.Discussion of apparent binding free energies with one titratable group, MBAR/PBSA accuracy, binding free energy predictions for all conditions, illustration of restraint definitions, decharging and VDW free energies from alchemical simulations, illustration of the UPA active site with ligand, B-Factor, GAFF and GAFF2 structure analysis, and correlation plots of binding affinity for ligand restraints, differing protonation states, with and without outlier and with MBAR/PBSA postprocessing (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01305/suppl_file/ct0c01305_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Binding Free Energy Calculations For Mmp2-Hydroxamate Complexes

Binding Affinity of Hydroxamate Inhibitors of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2

Predictions Of Binding Of A Diverse Set Of Ligands To Gelatinase-A By A Combination Of Molecular Dynamics And Continuum Solvent Models

Molecular docking simulations between hydroxamates and MMP-2

Binding Affinities for A Series of Selective Inhibitors of Gelatinase-A Using Molecular Dynamics with A Linear Interaction Energy Approach

Molecular docking studies of a group of hydroxamate inhibitors with gelatinase-A by molecular dynamics

Quantum Chemistry Study on the Interaction of the Exogenous Ligands and the Catalytic Zinc Ion in Matrix Metalloproteinases

A Computational Analysis of the Binding Affinities of FKBP12 Inhibitors Using the MM‐PB/SA Method

Calculation of Relative Binding Free Energy for Mutations in Protein Complexes: The Alchemical Path

Assessing the Performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA Methods. 1. The Accuracy of Binding Free Energy Calculations Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Insights into the binding mechanisms of inhibitors of MDM2 based on molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy calculations

Prediction of binding free energies between benzamides and trypsin

Molecular Dynamic Simulations Give Insight into the Mechanism of Binding Between 2-Aminothiazole Inhibitors and CDK5

Estimating the Roles of Protonation and Electronic Polarization in Absolute Binding Affinity Simulations

Binding free energy of protein/ligand complexes calculated using dissociation Parallel Cascade Selection Molecular Dynamics and Markov state model

Binding Free Energy Calculation Based on the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method and Its Application in Designing Novel SHP-2 Allosteric Inhibitors

Free Energy Profile and Kinetics of Coupled Folding and Binding of the Intrinsically Disordered Protein p53 with MDM2

Protocols for metallo- and serine-β-lactamase free energy predictions: insights from cross-class inhibitors

Revealing The Binding Modes And The Unbinding Of 14-3-3 Sigma Proteins And Inhibitors By Computational Methods

The Prediction of Binding Free Energies for a Group of Trypsin Inhibitors

Interpretation of the Binding Affinities of PTP1B Inhibitors with the MM-GB/SA Method and the X-score Scoring Function.