Differences Of Craniofacial Characteristics In Oral Breathing And Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Guangyao Feng,Xu Gong,Min Yu,Xin Huang,Xuemei Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006957
2021-01-01
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Abstract:Background: Oral breathing (OB) was considered associated with specific craniofacial structures and same for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This study aimed to investigate the differences of craniofacial structures between OB and OSA. Methods: In this retrospective study, 317 children under age 18 years were recruited and divided into OB group, OSA group, and control group. OSA group (15 boys, 4 girls) were referred from qualified sleep center and diagnosed as pediatric OSA with full-night polysomnography. OB group (10 boys, 10 girls) were mostly referral from pediatric or ENT department, some of whom undertook polysomnography and were not OSA. Control group consisted of orthodontic patients within the same period. Lateral cephalograms were obtained in all groups and their parameters were compared with Chinese normal values and each other. Results: R-PNS of OB group (18.04 +/- 2.49 mm) was greater than OSA group (14.27 +/- 4.36 mm) and even control group (16.22 +/- 3.91 mm) (P < 0.01). U1-NA was also the greatest in OB group (7.15 +/- 2.92 mm), followed by OSA group (4.88 +/- 2.66 mm), while control group was the smallest (5.71 +/- 2.94 mm) (P < 0.05). In addition, OB group presented the smallest adenoids and tonsils among three groups. Bony nasopharynx development, mandibular length and growth direction of mandible of OB group were all better than OSA group. Conclusion: Despite of oral breathing, anatomical morphology (well-developed dentoalveolar structures; mild adenotonsillar hypertrophy) might protect children from developing OSA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?