Multi-decadal fluctuations in root zone storage capacity through vegetation adaptation to hydro-climatic variability has minor effects on the hydrological response in the Neckar basin, Germany

Siyuan Wang,Markus Hrachowitz,Gerrit Schoups
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-62
IF: 6.3
2024-03-05
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Abstract:Climatic variability can considerably affect the catchment-scale root zone storage capacity (S umax ) which is a critical factor regulating latent heat fluxes and thus the moisture exchange between land and atmosphere as well as the hydrological response and biogeochemical processes in terrestrial hydrological systems. However, direct quantification of changes in S umax over long time periods and the mechanistic drivers thereof at the catchment-scaleare missing so far. As a consequence, it remains unclear how climatic variability, such as precipitation regime or canopy water demand, affects S umax and how fluctuations in S umax may influence the partitioning of water fluxes and therefore, also affect the hydrological response at the catchment-scale. The objectives of this study in the Upper Neckar river basin in Germany are therefore to provide a detailed analysis of multi-decadal changes in S umax that can be observed as a result of changing climatic conditions over a 70-year period and how this further affects hydrological dynamics. More specifically, we test the hypotheses that (1) S umax significantly changes over multiple decades reflecting vegetation adaptation to climate variability, (2) changes in S umax are a dominant control on the evaporative index I E = E A /P and thus on the partitioning of water into drainage and evaporative fluxes as described by deviations ΔI E from parametric Budyko curves over time, (3) changes in S umax also affect short term hydrological response dynamics and a time-dynamic implementation of S umax as parameter in a hydrological model can improve the performance of a hydrological model. In this study, based on long-term daily hydrological records (1953–2022) and a stepwise approach over multiple consecutive 20-year periods, we found that variability in hydroclimatic conditions, with aridity index I A (i.e. E P /P) ranging between ~ 0.9 and 1.1 over the study period was accompanied by deviations ΔI E between -0.02 and 0.01 from the expected I E inferred from the long-term parametric Budyko curve. Similarly, fluctuations in S umax , ranging between ~ 95 and 115 mm or 20 %, were observed over the same time period. While uncorrelated with long-term mean precipitation and potential evaporation, it was shown that the magnitude of S umax is controlled by the ratio of winter or summer precipitation (p < 0.05). In other words, S umax in the study region does not depend on the overall wetness condition as for example expressed by I A , but rather on how water supply by precipitation is distributed over the year. However, fluctuations in S umax were found to be uncorrelated with observed changes in ΔI E . Consequently, replacing a long-term average, time-invariant estimate of S umax with a time-variable, dynamically changing formulation of that parameter in a hydrological model did not result in an improved representation of the long-term partitioning of water fluxes, as expressed by I E (and fluctuations ΔI E thereof), nor in an improved representation of the shorter-term response dynamics. Overall, this study provides quantitative mechanistic evidence that S umax significantly changes over multiple decades reflecting vegetation adaptation to climatic variability. However, this temporal evolution of S umax cannot explain long-term fluctuations in the partitioning of water (and thus latent heat) fluxes as expressed by deviations ΔI E from the parametric Budyko curve over multiple time periods with different climatic conditions. Similarly, it does not have any significant effects on shorter term hydrological response characteristics of the upper Neckar catchment. This further suggests that accounting for temporal evolution of S umax with a time-variable formulation of that parameter in a hydrological model does not improve its ability to reproduce the hydrological response and may therefore be of minor importance to predict the effects of a changing climate on the hydrological response in the study region over the next decades to come.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,water resources
What problem does this paper attempt to address?