From Third World to New South

Jorge Heine
2010-01-01
Abstract:It is official now. Robert Zoellick, president of the World Bank, has pronounced the expression “Third World” as dead. This comes with some delay. In theory, use of the term should have ceased more than twenty years ago, in November 1989, after the fall of the Berlin Wall marked the end of the “Second World”, that of “actually existing socialism.” Without a Second World, is it possible to have a Third World? There is a lag between events and linguistic use, but, twenty years?Isn't this a bit much for the digital age, one marked by the 24/7 news cycle, the “CNN syndrome,” Twitter, and one that coins new terms almost every hour?
What problem does this paper attempt to address?